Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 25;12(2):65. doi: 10.3390/bios12020065

Table 1.

Comparison of analytical parameters for various formats of optical immunoassays and immunosensors used for hGH detection.

Analytical System for hGH Detection Linear or Dynamic Range LOD Sensitivity Ref.
SPR-based immunosensors for the direct detection using reduced half antibody fragments 10–720 nmol L−1 3.4 nmol L−1 [25]
SPR-based immunosensors for the direct detection using antibody immobilization via protein G 3–9 nmol L−1 0.99 nmol L−1 [26]
SPR-based inhibition immunosensor format using surface modified with hGH 18–542 ng mL−1
(0.82–24.6 nmol L−1)
4 ng mL−1
(0.18 nmol L−1)
[37]
Sandwich ELISA, p-anti-hGH/hGH/anti-hGH-B/S-HRP, absorbance at 450 nm. 1–25 ng mL−1
(0.046–1.14 nmol L−1)
0.25 ng mL−1
(0.0114 nmol L−1)
[38]
Sandwich ELISA, anti-hGH/hGH/anti-hGH-B/S-HRP, absorbance at 450 nm. 2.5–600 pg mL−1
1.1·10−4–0.027 nmol L−1
4 pg mL−1
(1.8·10−4 nmol L−1)
[13]
Sandwich ELISA, m-anti-hGH/hGH/m-anti-hGH-HRP, absorbance at 450 nm. 0.5–50 ng mL−1
(0.023–2.27 nmol L−1)
0.5 ng mL−1
(0.023 nmol L−1)
[39]
Indirect detection, MNPs-Au/m-anti-hGH/hGH/p-anti-hGH-B/S-HRP immunoassay, absorbance at 450 nm. 0.1–5.0 nmol L−1 0.082 nmol L−1 Current work