Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 13;14(4):932. doi: 10.3390/cancers14040932

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of PFS and OS.

PFS OS
Univariate Multivariate Univariate Multivariate
N HR [95% CI] p-Value N HR [95% CI] p-Value N HR [95% CI] p-Value N HR [95% CI] p-Value
Age at inclusion #, years 91 1.02 (1.002–1.04) 0.0334 91 1.02
(1.00–1.04)
0.0378 91 1.01 (0.99–1.04) 0.286
Metastasis to diagnosis interval #, years 91 1.02 (0.98–1.06) 0.34 91 1.03 (0.99–1.08) 0.173
Pathological type of primary tumor lobular vs. ductal 81 1.24 (0.53–2.86) 0.621 81 1.60 (0.57–4.49) 0.371
Pathological grade of primary 2 vs. 1 74 0.74 (0.28–1.97) 0.453 74 0.64 (0.19–2.18) 0.533
3 vs. 1 0.59 (0.23–1.55) 0.53 (0.16–1.80)
Molecular subtype of primary HER2pos 90 1.47 (0.74–2.91) 0.151 90 1.50 (0.67–3.39) 0.262
TN 1.99 (0.96–4.12) 1.98 (0.85–4.64)
Molecular subtype of metastasis HER2pos 87 0.87 (0.43–1.76) 0.866 87 1.26 (0.58–2.73) 0.694
TN 1.05 (0.67–1.67) 1.25 (0.73–2.14)
Bone metastasis yes vs. no 91 0.89 (0.57–1.38) 0.591 91 1.04 (0.62–1.74) 0.892
Liver metastasis yes vs. no 91 0.81 (0.52–1.25) 0.335 91 1.01 (0.62–1.66) 0.958
Lung-pleural metastasis yes vs. no 91 1.09 (0.72–1.66) 0.679 91 1.06 (0.65–1.71) 0.817
Brain-meningeal metastasis yes vs. no 91 1.42 (0.73–2.75) 0.304 91 3.15 (1.58–6.28) 0.00115 91 2.74
(1.37–5.48)
0.00454
Lymph node metastasis yes vs. no 91 1.06 (0.68–1.65) 0.784 91 1.14 (0.68–1.91) 0.607
Skin metastasis yes vs. no 91 1.02 (0.60–1.74) 0.942 91 1.43 (0.81–2.51) 0.219
Peritoneum metastasis yes vs. no 91 1.20 (0.62–2.32) 0.597 91 1.50 (0.71–3.16) 0.287
Other metastatic site yes vs. no 91 0.95 (0.59–1.53) 0.845 91 1.34 (0.80–2.23) 0.269
Number of metastasic sites at inclusion #, N 91 1.00 (0.86–1.15) 0.948 91 1.12 (0.96–1.30) 0.158
Number of previous lines of systemic therapy at inclusion #, N 91 1.10 (1.01–1.21) 0.0348 91 1.06
(0.96–1.16)
0.23193 91 1.11 (1.01–1.23) 0.0396 91 1.09
(0.98–1.20)
0.10355
all atypical circulating cells positive vs. negative 91 1.37 (0.89–2.10) 0.158 91 1.50 (0.91–2.49) 0.115
s-aCTC positive vs. negative 91 1.51 (0.99–2.29) 0.056 91 1.51 (0.93–2.45) 0.093
CTM positive vs. negative 91 1.16 (0.77–1.76) 0.478 91 1.35 (0.83–2.20) 0.221
g-aCTC positive vs. negative 91 1.94 (1.25–3.01) 0.00298 91 1.87
(1.19–2.95)
0.00661 91 2.46 (1.47–4.12) 0.000584 91 2.23
(1.31–3.78)
0.00298

#: variables tested as continuous values. Statistically significant p-value are in bold.