Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 31;12(2):199. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12020199

Table 1.

Overview of included studies.

Cohort Name Cohort Design N * at Risk N * Incident PD Mean Age, yrs ** % Females Duration of Follow-Up, yrs (Range) **
Montréal cohort [18] Enriched iRBD cohort 47 10 70.7 27.0 3.5 (1.0–6.0)
ABC Study [19] Population-based cohort 2424 42 75.6 51.6 10
Homburg/Saar cohort [20] Population-based cohort 468 5 57.5 53.0 6.7 (2.0–10.1)
BLSA cohort [21] Population-based cohort 40 10 79.4 20.0 2.6 (1.0–5.3)
Rotterdam Study [23] Population-based cohort 7386 57 65.3 57.4 8.3 (0.0–15.0)
NEDICES cohort [26] Population-based cohort 2450 21 72.8 57.2 3.4 (2.9–3.9)
PARS cohort [27] Enriched cohort (hyposmia/familial) 136 8 67.1 38.0 3.8 (1.0–5.0)
Multicentre iRBD [25] Multicentre enriched iRBD cohort 430 57 *** 67.4 19.0 3.6
Amsterdam study [8] Enriched cohort (familial) 353 5 58.8 56.7 5

* N is the number of individuals per group. ** The numbers presented are the median for the Rotterdam study and the means for all other studies. *** The numbers presented are in reference to all persons in the cohort converting to PD; cognitive tests were administered on a subgroup. It is expected that the numbers presented in the table resemble the actual numbers. No regression was performed, and as such, this was deemed an acceptable surrogate.