Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 21;14(4):1079. doi: 10.3390/cancers14041079

Table 2.

Results of each model in the training cohort (institution 1).

Model AUC p Cut-Off (%) Se (%) Sp (%) Bacc (%) Below the Cut-Off Above the Cut-Off
Total
(n, %)
TN
(n, %)
FN
(n, %)
Total
(n, %)
FP
(n, %)
TP
(n, %)
Clinical 0.77 0.001 8.0 71.2 77.8 65.5 38 (59.4) 36 (94.7) 2 (5.3) 26 (40.6) 19 (73.1) 7 (26.9)
Radiomic 1.00 <0.0001 23.0 100.0 96.4 98.2 53 (82.8) 53 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 11 (17.2) 2 (18.2) 9 (81.8)
Combined 0.97 <0.0001 5.0 100.0 87.3 93.6 48 (75.0) 48 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 16 (25.0) 7 (43.7) 9 (56.2)
ComBat_Radiomic 1.00 <0.0001 17 100.0 100.0 100.0 55 (85.9) 55 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 9 (14.1) 0 (0.0) 9 (100.0)
ComBat_Combined 0.95 <0.0001 6.0 100.0 80.0 90.0 44 (68.7) 44 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 20 (31.2) 11 (55.0) 9 (45.0)

Abbreviations: AUC: area under the curve; Se: sensitivity; Sp: specificity; Bacc: balanced accuracy; TN: true negative; FN: false negative; FP: false positive; TP: true positive.