Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 18;9(2):289. doi: 10.3390/children9020289

Table 4.

Comparison of helicopter EMS vs. ground EMS characteristics of the study cohort.

Helicopter EMS ETI Ground EMS ETI p
n (%) 30 (56.2) 29 (44.6)
Age (years) 14.5 (6) 16 (8) 0.681
Male, n (%) 19 (63.3) 19 (65.5) 1
Height (cm) 155.7 (27.2) 152.8 (31.3) 0.968
Weight (kg) 52.6 (21.8) 54.6 (27.7) 0.652
BMI 20 (5) 21 (8) 0.575
GCS 8 (11) 5 (7) 0.043
ISS 25 (18) 34 (20) 0.034
SBP (mmHg) 111 (52) 80 (110) 0.003
HR (min−1) 108.5 (35) 98 (59) 0.067
SpO2 (%) 94.5 (10) 94 (77) 0.435
ETI misplacement, n (%) 4 (13.3) 11 (37.9) 0.039
CPR prior ED, n (%) 6 (20) 11 (37.9) 0.158
24 h mortality, n (%) 2 (6.7) 5 (17.2) 0.254
30-day mortality, n (%) 5 (16.7) 12 (41.4) 0.047

EMS, emergency medical service; ETI, endotracheal intubation; BMI, body mass index; GCS, Glasgow coma scale; ISS, injury severity score; SBP, systolic blood pressure; HR, heart rate; SpO2, peripheral oxygen saturation; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ED, emergency department; WBCT, whole-body computed tomography. Squared brackets indicate interquartile ranges (IQR) preceded by medians, while round brackets of continuous traits indicate standard deviations, preceded by means.