Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 25;12(2):296. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020296

Table 4.

Comparison of studies performed before and after 2011.

Study OR CI
Lower Limit
CI
Upper Limit
Weight
Santino et al., 2004 [45] 6.50 2.26 18.73 13.92%
Tomao et al., 2005 [46] 0.67 0.22 2.04 13.43%
Cisak et al., 2005 [47] 8.93 3.00 26.60 13.62%
Rojko et al., 2005 [48] 2.91 1.30 6.53 16.90%
Cisak et al., 2008 [49] 7.71 2.20 27.03 11.98%
Kaya et al., 2008 [50] 0.78 0.03 17.93 3.41%
Buczek et al., 2009 [51] 2.09 1.45 3.02 22.93%
Di Rienzi et al., 2010 [52] 1.67 0.11 24.94 4.71%
Until 2010 3.03 1.39 6.61 47.14%
Cisak et al., 2012 [54] 2.55 0.59 11.00 8.16%
Tabibi et al., 2013 [56] 0.59 0.15 2.42 8.56%
Jovanovic, 2015 [57] 1.00 0.10 10.31 3.93%
Bucak, 2016 [60] 0.54 0.19 1.53 14.26%
De Keukeleire et al., 2016 [61] 2.46 0.51 11.85 6.98%
Cora et al., 2017 [65] 0.89 0.56 1.41 41.29%
De Keukeleire et al., 2017 [66] 2.03 0.80 5.16 16.81%
After 2011 1.08 0.63 1.85 52.86%
Combined effect size 1.76 0.58 5.29