Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 3;24(2):236. doi: 10.3390/e24020236

Table 2.

Comparison of three iterative methods using P2P1P2P2 (h=164 and ν=1).

Scheme (uuhn)0u0 pphn0p0 (TThn)0T0 (CChn)0C0
I 0.000717912 0.000206301 0.000359132 0.00094964
II 0.000717912 0.000206303 0.000359132 0.00094964
III 0.000717912 0.000206251 0.000359145 0.000949645