Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 29;12(2):344. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020344

Table 8.

Performance comparison of CHC-Otsu algorithm against leading methods on 2594 images from ISIC 2018 dataset.

Methods Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity Dice
SDI+ [9] a 0.87 0.87 0.89 0.75
SPCA [36] b 0.84 0.59 0.92 0.62
[34] b 0.93 0.87 0.97 0.87
RU-Net [31] b 0.88 0.79 0.93 0.68
R2U-Net [31] b 0.90 0.73 0.97 0.69
Attention ResU-Net [35] b 0.92 0.84 0.95 0.85
R2AU-Net [35] b 0.93 0.82 0.97 0.87
CHC-Otsu a 0.92 0.78 0.99 0.81

a unsupervised method; b supervised method.