Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 14;12(2):495. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020495

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Plots of the structural similarity (SSIM) vs. reference vs. without pre-reconstruction processing, reference vs. with multiscale bilateral filtering (MSBF) pre-reconstruction processing, reference vs. pix2pix pre-reconstruction processing from the in-focus plane for low dose with variant phantom thickness. (a) In-focus plane for evaluation of 0.19- and 0.23-mm microcalcifications (MCs); (b) in-focus plane for evaluation of 0.29-mm MCs and 3.9-mm masses; (c) in-focus plane for evaluation of 4.7-mm mass. h: approximately 50% reduction of automatic exposure control reference dose (AECrd); q: approximately 75% reduction of AECrd. (Tukey–Kramer test; p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference, *: significant).