Table 2.
Quality assessment of the included reviews, assessed against the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses.
| Criteria | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Included Review | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | C6 | C7 | C8 | C9 | C10 | C11 | Criteria Met (%) |
| Broekhuizen, 2014 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | 82% |
| Engel, 2018 | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | Y | Y | 73% |
| Finch, 2016 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 100% |
| Hnatuik, 2019 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | Y | Y | 82% |
| Ling, 2015 | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | Y | Y | 73% |
| Mehtala, 2014 | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | U | Y | N | Y | Y | 73% |
| Peden, 2018 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | U | N | Y | Y | 73% |
| Van Capelle, 2017 | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 91% |
| Ward, 2015 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | U | Y | N | Y | Y | 73% |
| Wolfenden, 2020 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 100% |
C1: Is the review question explicitly stated?; C2: Were the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question?; C3: Was the search strategy appropriate?; C4: Were the sources and resources used to search for studies adequate?; C5: Were the criteria for appraising studies appropriate?; C6: Was critical appraisal conducted by two or more reviewers independently?; C7: Were there methods to minimize errors in data extraction?; C8: Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate?; C9: Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed?; C10: Were recommendations for policy and/or practice supported by the reported data?; C11: Were the specific directives for new research appropriate?