Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 9;19(4):1917. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19041917

Table 4.

Sensitivity Analyses with Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE). Binomial Analysis of Child Frequency of Consumption.

Group Time Control 3
Group × Time
Intervention 3
Group × Time
Outcomes OR 1
(95% CI 2)
p-Value OR
(95% CI)
p-Value OR
(95% CI)
p-Value OR
(95% CI)
p-Value
SSBs
(n = 228)
0.87
(0.55, 1.36)
0.53 0.74
(0.55, 1.00)
0.05 0.74
(0.48, 1.13)
0.16 0.74
(0.49, 1.13)
0.16
100% Fruit Juice
(n = 225)
0.74
(0.48, 1.16)
0.19 0.93
(0.67, 1.28)
0.65 0.91
(0.58, 1.44)
0.70 0.94
(0.59, 1.49)
0.80
French Fries
(n = 225)
0.84
(0.50, 1.39)
0.49 0.75
(0.55, 1.02)
0.07 1.00
(0.64, 1.57)
1.00 0.56
(0.36, 0.86)
0.009
Fast Foods
(n = 223)
0.90
(0.55, 1.50)
0.69 0.69
(0.50, 0.95)
0.02 0.86
(0.53, 1.38)
0.53 0.55
(0.36, 0.84)
0.006
Sweets
(n = 223)
0.85
(0.56, 1.31)
0.47 0.66
(0.47, 0.92)
0.02 0.59
(0.35, 0.98)
0.04 0.73
(0.47, 1.15)
0.17
Salty Snacks
(n = 224)
1.27
(0.84, 1.92)
0.25 0.73
(0.51, 1.05)
0.09 0.59
(0.37, 1.00)
0.05 0.91
(0.57, 1.47)
0.71

1 OR: odds ratio, 2 CI: confidence intervals, and 3 GEE: generalized estimating equation. GEE binomial models with logit link assessed repeated measures of frequency of consumption at baseline and six weeks post-intervention. Binomial models were adjusted by sex (ref = boys), site (ref = Illinois), child age group (ref = <144 months). Group x time interaction. Boldface type indicates statistical significance p < 0.05.