Skip to main content
. 2020 May 14;29(1):204–212. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02141-0

Table 2.

Rest and stress MBF (mL/min/g) and MFR values calculated for the D690 and the Vereos PET scans, for the three vascular territories (LAD, LCX, and RCA) and the whole myocardium (global). No significant differences were observed between the D690 and the Vereos PET (P ≥ 0.11)

Territory PET scanner Rest MBF (N = 28) Stress MBF (N = 25) MFR (N = 24)
LAD D690 0.9 [0.7–1.1] 2.0 [1.8–2.5] 2.3 [2.0–2.8]
Vereos 0.9 [0.7–1.0] 2.2 [1.7–2.4] 2.3 [2.0–2.7]
LCX D690 0.9 [0.7–1.1] 2.2 [1.9–2.5] 2.3 [2.0–2.9]
Vereos 0.9 [0.7–1.1] 2.1 [1.6–2.3] 2.3 [1.8–2.7]
RCA D690 0.9 [0.7–1.1] 2.2 [2.0–2.5] 2.3 [2.0–3.0]
Vereos 0.9 [0.7–1.2] 2.3 [2.0–2.9] 2.4 [1.9–3.3]
Global D690 0.9 [0.7–1.0] 2.0 [1.8–2.5] 2.3 [2.0–2.9]
Vereos 0.9 [0.7–1.0] 2.1 [1.7–2.5] 2.3 [2.0–2.8]

Data are presented as median (interquartile range)

LAD, left anterior descending; LCX, left circumflex; MBF, myocardial blood flow; MFR, myocardial flow reserve; and RCA, right coronary artery