Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 24;12:3161. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07148-w

Table 2.

Influence of CETM and P-fertilization practices on lysine (g per kg dry matter), tryptophan content (µg g−1) and grain-P uptake (kg ha−1) of maize under MWCS.

Treatment Lysine content (g per kg dry matter) Tryptophan (µg g−1) P uptake by grains (kg ha−1)
2018 2019 Mean 2018 2019 Mean 2018 2019 Mean
CETM practices
FBCT–FBCT 2.45 2.44 2.44 0.64 0.65 0.64 14.92 15.45 15.18
RBCT–RBZT 2.48 2.46 2.47 0.64 0.66 0.65 16.30 16.77 16.53
FBZT–FBZT 2.44 2.48 2.46 0.66 0.66 0.66 14.54 17.35 15.94
PRBZT–PRBZT 2.48 2.47 2.47 0.65 0.67 0.66 18.28 19.03 18.65
SEm ±  0.02 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.60 0.38 0.41
CD (p = 0.05) NS NS NS NS NS NS 2.01 1.31 1.41
P–fertilization practices
P100 2.55 2.59 2.57 0.65 0.67 0.67 14.78 16.52 15.65
P50 + 2FSP 2.47 2.50 2.48 0.72 0.73 0.72 16.46 17.81 17.13
P50 + PSB + AMF 2.45 2.42 2.44 0.66 0.69 0.68 17.18 17.29 17.24
P50 + PSB + AMF + 2FSP 2.72 2.75 2.74 0.74 0.75 0.74 18.73 20.98 19.86
P0 2.11 2.06 2.09 0.45 0.43 0.44 12.88 13.14 13.01
SEm ±  0.06 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.72 0.57 0.51
CD (p = 0.05) 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.04 0.05 0.04 2.06 1.64 1.47
Interaction NS NS NS NS NS NS S S S

CD values indicate the critical difference at p = 0.05.