Table 3.
Influence of CETM and P-fertilization practices on oil content (%) and oil yield (kg ha−1) of maize under MWCS.
| Treatment | Oil content (%) | Oil yield (kg ha−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018–19 | 2019–20 | Mean | 2018–19 | 2019–20 | Mean | |
| CETM practices | ||||||
| FBCT–FBCT | 4.62 | 4.64 | 4.63 | 251.3 | 252.0 | 251.7 |
| RBCT–RBZT | 4.63 | 4.66 | 4.65 | 266.6 | 272.3 | 269.4 |
| FBZT–FBZT | 4.73 | 4.75 | 4.74 | 269.3 | 274.2 | 271.8 |
| PRBZT–PRBZT | 4.81 | 4.86 | 4.83 | 292.7 | 301.7 | 297.2 |
| CD (p = 0.05) | NS | NS | NS | 25.09 | 18.56 | 15.00 |
| P–fertilization practices | ||||||
| P100 | 4.81 | 4.86 | 4.84 | 266.8 | 274.6 | 270.7 |
| P50 + 2FSP | 4.79 | 4.82 | 4.81 | 276.2 | 281.3 | 278.7 |
| P50 + PSB + AMF | 4.59 | 4.61 | 4.60 | 272.9 | 275.6 | 274.2 |
| P50 + PSB + AMF + 2FSP | 4.86 | 4.95 | 4.90 | 303.0 | 315.7 | 309.3 |
| P0 | 4.43 | 4.40 | 4.41 | 231.2 | 228.0 | 229.6 |
| CD (p = 0.05) | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 21.55 | 22.56 | 19.7 |
| Interaction | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
CD values indicate the critical difference at p = 0.05.