Table 5. Laboratory methods to diagnose syphilis, gonorrhoea and chlamydia, six WHO European Region countries, 2015–2019.
Belarus | Georgia | Kazakhstan | Montenegro | Serbia | Ukraine | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Laboratory methods used to confirm a case of syphilis | ||||||
Detection of T. pallidum antibodies by screening test (TPHA, TPPA or EIA) | + | + | + | + | + | + |
RPR/VDRL | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Detection of IgM antibodies to T. pallidum | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Demonstration of T. pallidum in lesion exudates or tissues | + | + | + | − | − | + |
- Dark-field microscopic examination | + | + | + | − | − | + |
- Direct fluorescent antibody T. pallidum test | − | − | + | − | − | − |
- Molecular detection | − | − | − | − | − | + |
Other | +a | − | − | − | +b | − |
Laboratory methods used to confirm a case of congenital syphilis | ||||||
Demonstration of T. pallidum in the umbilical cord, the placenta, a nasal discharge or skin lesion material | − | + | − | − | − | + |
- Dark-field microscopic examination | − | + | − | − | − | + |
- Direct fluorescent antibody T. pallidum test | − | − | − | − | − | − |
Detection of T. pallidum-specific IgM | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Reactive non-treponemal test (VDRL, RPR) in the baby's/child’s serum | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Other | +a | - | - | - | +c | +d |
Laboratory methods used to confirm a case of gonorrhoea | ||||||
Isolation and confirmation of N. gonorrhoeae from a clinical specimen | + | - | + | + | + | + |
Detection of N. gonorrhoeae nucleic acid in a clinical specimen | + | + | + | + | + | + |
- Genital samples | + | + | + | + | + | + |
- Rectal samples | + | + | - | - | - | + |
- Pharyngeal samples | + | - | - | - | - | + |
Demonstration of N. gonorrhoeae by a non-amplified nucleic acid probe test in a clinical specimen | − | − | − | − | − | − |
Microscopic detection of intracellular Gram-negative diplococci in an urethral male specimen | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Identification of culture | + | + | + | + | + | + |
- Gram | + | + | + | + | + | + |
- Oxidase | + | + | - | + | + | + |
- Biochemical tests | - | + | - | - | - | + |
- Molecular tests | + | - | + | - | + | + |
Other | − | − | − | − | − | − |
Laboratory methods used to confirm a case of chlamydia | ||||||
Isolation of C. trachomatis from a specimen of the anogenital tract or from the conjunctiva | + | + | - | - | - | - |
Demonstration of C. trachomatis by DFA test in a clinical specimen | + | + | + | - | + | + |
Detection of C. trachomatis nucleic acid in a clinical specimen | + | + | + | + | + | + |
- Genital samples | + | + | + | + | + | + |
- Rectal samples | + | + | - | - | - | + |
- Pharyngeal samples | + | - | - | - | - | + |
Other methods | +e | +f | - | - | - | - |
+: method available; −: method not available; C. trachomatis: Chlamydia trachomatis; DFA: direct fluorescent antibody; EIA: enzyme immunoassays; N. gonorrhoeae: Neisseria gonorrhoeae; RPR: rapid plasma reagin; T. pallidum: Treponema pallidum; TPHA: T. pallidum haemagglutination assay; TPPA: T. pallidum particle agglutination assay; VDRL: venereal disease research laboratory test; WHO: World Health Organization.
a Passive hemagglutination reaction, indirect immunofluorescence, immunoblotting performed when the results of other treponemal tests are questionable or contradictory.
b Line blot.
c TPHA.
d In most laboratories, a non-treponemal test used is microprecipitation reaction (modification of VDRL).
e Culture (for women only), immunofluorescence reaction.
f EIA.