Table 4.
Glycemic Outcomes for the Adolescent Cohort on Scenario 1.
| No. | Algorithm | Mean BG | %TIR70-180 | %TB70 | %TB54 | %TA180 | %TA250 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Basal-IQ | 163.9 ± 17.3 | 63.0 ± 14.3 | 2.73 ± 3.06 | 1.45 ± 2.29 | 34.29 ± 12.07 | 9.94 ± 10.73 |
| 2 | Loop | 175.9 ± 16.7(3,4) | 60.2 ± 10.5 | 1.25 ± 2.21 | 0.62 ± 1.57 | 38.53 ± 8.75(4) | 17.39 ± 9.73(4) |
| 3 | BiAP | 157.2 ± 14.2(2) | 68.0 ± 14.1 | 2.20 ± 3.11 | 1.02 ± 1.95 | 29.84 ± 11.80 | 7.63 ± 8.79 |
| 4 | BiAP-Adaptive | 147.0 ± 8.8(2) | 74.7 ± 13.1 | 2.80 ± 4.11 | 1.43 ± 2.88 | 22.50 ± 9.74(2) | 4.40 ± 4.92(2) |
| P value | <.001 | .080 | .68 | .81 | <.05 | <.05 | |
| No. | Algorithm | LBGI | HBGI | RI | INSULIN | MAG | |
| 1 | Basal-IQ | 1.12 ± 1.54 | 7.69 ± 3.76 | 8.81 ± 4.85 | 48.7 ± 17.4 | 2.11 ± 0.53 | |
| 2 | Loop | 0.58 ± 0.99 | 10.19 ± 3.84(4) | 10.77 ± 4.65 | 46.4 ± 15.8 | 2.58 ± 0.61 | |
| 3 | BiAP | 0.88 ± 1.42 | 6.52 ± 3.18 | 7.40 ± 4.27 | 49.8 ± 17.8 | 2.06 ± 0.55 | |
| 4 | BiAP-Adaptive | 1.11 ± 1.85 | 4.89 ± 2.10(2) | 6.00 ± 3.69 | 51.8 ± 18.5 | 1.97 ± 0.50 | |
| P value | .83 | <.01 | .11 | .91 | .08 | ||
P values in the last row correspond to the ANOVA test, and the numbers within the superindex indicate the groups that are statistically different (P < .05) as a result of the post hoc analysis.
Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; BG, blood glucose; BiAP, bio-inspired artificial pancreas; HBGI, high blood glucose index; INSULIN, average insulin units per day; LBGI, low blood glucose index; MAG, mean absolute glucose; RI, risk index.