Table 2.
Use of Shared RT-CGM Data.
|
N (%) agreed |
P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Partners (n = 212) |
Parents (n = 303) |
||
| Celebrates: When seeing my partner/child’s numbers, I celebrate him/her when things are going well | 168 (79.2) | 246 (81.2) | .585 |
| Lack of Understanding: I do not really understand how best to respond when seeing my partner/child’s numbers | 13 (6.1) | 8 (2.6) | .049 |
| Offer Encouragement: I offer my partner/child encouragement when I see he/she is struggling with his/her numbers | 189 (89.2) | 249 (82.2) | .029 |
| Hypoglycemic Knowledge: I know just what to do if I see that my partner/child’s blood sugars are getting too low | 205 (96.7) | 296 (97.7) | .496 |
| Bug him/her: Because of data sharing, I now bug my partner/child too much about his/her numbers | 62 (29.2) | 96 (31.7) | .555 |
| Clear Discussion: My partner/child and I have had a clear discussion about how I should best respond (or not) when seeing that his/her numbers are out of range. | 145 (68.4) | 168 (55.4) | .003 |
Data presented reflect N (%) of partner/parent respondents who (somewhat or strongly) agreed with each item.
All items were rated on a five-point Likert response scale: 1 = “Strongly Disagree,” 2 = “Somewhat Disagree,” 3 = “Neutral,” 4 = “Somewhat Agree,” 5 = “Strongly Agree.” Items were analyzed as continuous variables for significance testing; however, response categories 4 and 5 were collapsed to reflect “Agreed” for data presentation purposes.