Table 3.
Perceived Value of RT-CGM Data Sharing.
|
N (%) agreed |
P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Partners (n = 212) |
Parents (n = 303) |
||
| Data sharing gives me peace of mind | 186 (87.7) | 268 (88.4) | .805 |
| Because of data sharing, I am more critical about the choices my partner/child is making about his/her diabetes | 122 (57.5) | 163 (53.8) | .399 |
| Thanks to data sharing, if my partner/child needs help, I have his/her back | 196 (92.5) | 287 (94.7) | .294 |
| Using data sharing with my partner/child makes me feel like a member of his/her diabetes team | 196 (92.5) | 266 (87.8) | .086 |
| Data sharing has improved the relationship with my partner/child | 121 (57.1) | 117 (38.6) | <.001 |
| Because of data sharing, I feel more understanding about how challenging diabetes can be | 192 (90.6) | 264 (87.1) | .228 |
| Using data sharing, I now feel more confident about helping my partner/child with his/her diabetes | 200 (94.3) | 279 (92.1) | .322 |
| Because of data sharing, I now feel less anxious about my partner/child | 183 (86.3) | 257 (84.8) | .634 |
| Because of data sharing, I now feel more anxious about my partner/child | 23 (10.8) | 41 (13.5) | .364 |
| Data sharing has caused more tension in my relationship with my partner/child | 20 (9.4) | 38 (12.5) | .272 |
| Data sharing has given me too much information. | 18 (8.5) | 28 (9.2) | .769 |
Data presented reflect N (%) of partner/parent respondents who (somewhat or strongly) agreed with each item.
Items were rated on a five-point Likert response scale: 1 = “Strongly Disagree,” 2 = “Somewhat Disagree,” 3 = “Neutral,” 4 = “Somewhat Agree,” 5 = “Strongly Agree.” Items were analyzed as continuous variables for significance testing; however, response categories 4 and 5 were collapsed to reflect “Agreed” for data presentation purposes.