Domain 1. Research team and reflexivity |
Personal characteristics |
Interviewer/facilitator |
Which author/s conducted the interview or focus group? |
p. 6 |
Credentials |
What were the researcher’s credentials? (e.g. PhD, MD) |
p. 6, title page |
Occupation |
What was their occupation at the time of the study? |
p. 6 |
Gender |
Was the researcher male or female? |
p. 6 |
Experience and training |
What experience or training did the researcher have? |
p. 6 |
Relationship with participants |
Relationship established |
Was a relationship established prior to study commencement? |
p. 7 |
Participant knowledge of the interviewer |
What did the participants know about the researcher? (e.g. personal goals, reasons for doing the research) |
p. 7, Supplement 1
|
Interviewer characteristics |
What characteristics were reported about the interviewer/facilitator? (e.g. bias, assumptions, reasons and interests in the research topic) |
N/A, not reported. However, interviewer biases and assumptions were documented in a reflexivity journal. |
Domain 2: Study design |
Theoretical framework |
Methodological orientation and theory |
What methodological orientation was stated to underpin the study? (e.g. grounded theory, discourse analysis, ethnography, phenomenology and content analysis) |
p. 6–7 |
Participant selection |
Sampling |
How were participants selected? (e.g. purposive, convenience, consecutive and snowball) |
p. 6 |
Method of approach |
How were participants approached? (e.g. face-to-face, telephone, mail and e-mail) |
p. 6 |
Sample size |
How many participants were in the study? |
p. 9 |
Nonparticipation |
|
p. 9 |
Setting |
Setting of data collection |
Where was the data collected? (e.g. home, clinic and workplace) |
p. 7, 9–10, Table 2
|
Presence of nonparticipants |
Was anyone else present besides the participants and researchers? |
p. 10 |
Description of sample |
What are the important characteristics of the sample? (e.g. demographic data and date) |
p. 9–10, Table 2
|
Data collection |
Interview guide |
|
p. 7, Supplement 1
|
Repeat interviews |
Were repeat interviews carried out? If yes, how many? |
p. 7 |
Audio/visual recording |
Did the research use audio or visual recording to collect the data? |
p. 7 |
Field notes |
Were field notes made during and/or after the interview or focus group? |
p. 7 |
Duration |
What was the duration of the interviews or focus group? |
p. 9–10 |
Data saturation |
Was data saturation discussed? |
p. 8 |
Transcripts returned |
Were transcripts returned to participants for comment and/or correction? |
p. 7 |
Domain 3: Analysis and findings |
Data analysis |
Number of data coders |
How many data coders coded the data? |
p. 8 |
Description of the coding tree |
Did authors provide a description of the coding tree? |
p. 7–8, 10, Table 3
|
Derivation of themes |
Were themes identified in advance or derived from the data? |
p. 7–8 |
Software |
What software, if applicable, was used to manage the data? |
p. 7 |
Participant checking |
Did participants provide feedback on the findings? |
p. 7–8 |
Reporting |
Quotations presented |
Were participant quotations presented to illustrate the themes/findings? Was each quotation identified? (e.g. participant number) |
Table 3
|
Data and findings consistent |
Was there consistency between the data presented and the findings? |
p. 10–14, Table 3
|
Clarity of major themes |
Were major themes clearly presented in the findings? |
p. 10–14 |
Clarity of minor themes |
Is there a description of diverse cases or discussion of minor themes? |
p. 10–14, Table 3
|