Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 14;14(4):726. doi: 10.3390/polym14040726

Table 3.

Comparison of cell growth and PHA accumulation by different microbial strains using sugarcane bagasse as a potential substrate.

Name of Substrate Type of Pretreatment Microorganism Operation Mode PHA Accumulation (%) PHA Concentration (g/L) Reference
Sugarcane bagasse Ultrasound + alkaline pretreatment Lysinibacillus sp. RGS Batch 61.5 5.31 [19]
Sugarcane bagasse Acid pretreatment Ralstonia eutropha Batch
50:50
56.7 6.06 [27]
Sugarcane bagasse Acid pretreatment Burkholderia glumae MA13 Batch 14.95 0.09 [31]
Sugarcane bagasse Acid pretreatment Burkholderia sp. F24 Fed-Batch 49.31 12.25 [33]
Sugarcane bagasse Acid pretreatment Detoxified Burkholderia cepacia IPT 048 Fed-batch 53 2.3 [34]
Sugarcane bagasse Acid pretreatment + Detoxified Burkholderia sacchari IPT 101 Fed batch 62 2.7 [34]
Sugarcane bagasse Acid pretreatment Halogeometricum borinquense strain E3 Batch 50.4 1.6 [47]
Sugarcane bagasse Biological pre-treatment with Pycnoporus coccineus MScMS1 Bacillus megaterium Ti3 Batch 65 0.58 [52]
Sugarcane bagasse Acid pretreatment Bacillus thuringiensis Batch 39.6 4.2 [53]
Sugarcane bagasse Acid pretreatment R. eutropha +Lysinibacillus sp. Co-culture Batch 70.0 6.38 This study