Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 25;12(2):153. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020153

Table 4.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Author Year Design Number of Patients Number of Sessions Total volume Injected (mL) Volume Per Session (mL) Expansion System Complications Health Quality
of Life
Babin [4] 2017 Case report 1 3 500 166 None Infection “Satisfied”
Babovic [23] 2010 Case report 1 6 1615 403.9 None 0 “Satisfied”
Bayti [24] 2015 Retrospective 22 4.9 1421 NR BRAVA 18.2% cytosteatonecrosis Breast Q: 98% “very satisfied”
4.5% hematoma
13.6% donor site irregularity
Cheng [25] 2013 Case report 1 2 430 215 BRAVA 0 -
Costantini [26] 2013 Prospective 2 2 302 100.48 None - -
Delaporte [27] 2009 Retrospective 15 3 600 - None 20% cytosteatonecrosis 66.7%
“very good”
Fabiocchi [28] 2017 Retrospective 57 3.6 640 318 Expander 0.75% hemorrhage donor site 64.8%
“excellent”
0.75% surgical site infection
Fitoussi [29] 2009 Case report 1 2 380 - None - -
Hammer-Hansen [30] 2015 Case report 1 7 957 136.71 BRAVA Rash -
Ho Quoc [31] 2016 Retrospective 6 790 - BRAVA - 82% “satisfied”
Ho Quoc [32] 2019 Retrospective 2 4 474 118 None - -
Hoppe [33] 2013 Retrospective 28 5 1020 159 None 2.59% cytosteatonecrosis 96% “high
0.74% infection satifaction”
0.74% granuloma
Jarrah [34] 2013 Case report 1 3 720 240 None - -
Kellou [35] 2019 Retrospective 22 5.86 1490.6 - None 50% hematoma donor site
22.7% lipolysis, -
44.4% puncture site burn,
11% lymphocele (donor site)
11% hip phlyctene
Longo [36] 2014 Prospective 21 4 439 137 None - -
Manconi [37] 2017 Retrospective 12 3 417 214 Expander 3.2 -
Mestak [38] 2013 Case report 1 3 815 271 BRAVA 0 -
Niddam [39] 2017 Retrospective 25 - - - None - Satisfaction rate: 5.8/10
Pannettiere [25] 2011 Case report 1 9 700 78 None 0 -
Serra-Renom [40] 2011 Case series 8 3 400 133 None 0 -
Stillaert [41] 2016 Case series 8 4 644 160 Expander 1 cyst -
Zhang [42] 2020 Retrospective 30 3,3 - 230.5 +/− BRAVA 3% cellulitis
27% cysts
3% palpable nodules
90%
“very satisfied”

Hyphens indicate data not available.