Table 3.
QTNs associated with BLP resistance identified by GWAS in the soybean association panel under artificial and natural morbidity conditions.
QTNs | Chromosome | Physical Position (bp) | −log10p a | r2 (%) b | Environment | Significant Associated Region |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gm05_7667820 | 5 | 7,667,820 | 4.06 | 3.30 | 2016JP-spray | 6,277,820–9,057,820 |
4.21 | 3.42 | 2018DT-natural | ||||
Gm05_7668047 | 5 | 7,668,047 | 4.06 | 3.30 | 2016JP-spray | |
4.21 | 3.42 | 2018DT-natural | ||||
Gm09_36501019 | 9 | 36,501,019 | 4.65 | 3.87 | 2014JP-spray | 35,111,019–37,891,019 |
4.24 | 3.48 | 2015JP-spray | ||||
Gm17_5628119 | 17 | 5,628,119 | 4.64 | 3.86 | 2016JP-spray | 4,238,119–7,018,119 |
4.45 | 3.65 | 2018DT-natural | ||||
Gm17_5628133 | 17 | 5,628,133 | 4.64 | 3.86 | 2016JP-spray | |
4.45 | 3.65 | 2018DT-natural | ||||
Gm17_7603802 | 17 | 7,603,802 | 4.14 | 3.39 | 2014JP-spray | 6,213,802–8,993,802 |
4.99 | 4.20 | 2015JP-spray | ||||
6.87 | 6.04 | 2016JP-spray | ||||
8.74 | 7.88 | 2018DT-natural | ||||
Gm17_7604008 | 17 | 7,604,008 | 5.04 | 4.24 | 2016JP-spray | |
6.76 | 5.89 | 2018DT-natural | ||||
Gm17_7603992 | 17 | 7,603,992 | 4.14 | 3.39 | 2014JP-spray | |
4.99 | 4.20 | 2015JP-spray | ||||
6.87 | 6.04 | 2016JP-spray | ||||
Gm17_7712768 | 17 | 7,712,768 | 5.13 | 4.35 | 2015JP-spray | |
6.77 | 5.94 | 2018DT-natural | ||||
8.17 | 7.30 | 2018JP-natural | ||||
4.13 | 3.31 | 2015JP-spray | ||||
Gm17_7721556 | 17 | 7,721,556 | 4.95 | 4.17 | 2016JP-spray | |
6.46 | 5.64 | 2018DT-natural | ||||
8.32 | 7.45 | 2015JP-spray | ||||
Gm17_7736150 | 17 | 7,736,150 | 4.33 | 3.58 | 2016JP-spray | |
5.19 | 4.39 | 2018DT-natural | ||||
6.68 | 5.81 | 2014JP-spray | ||||
Gm17_7754016 | 17 | 7,754,016 | 4.05 | 3.30 | 2015JP-spray | |
5.11 | 4.32 | 2016JP-spray | ||||
6.66 | 5.83 | 2018DT-natural | ||||
8.14 | 7.26 | 2014JP-spray | ||||
Gm17_7754048 | 17 | 7,754,048 | 4.05 | 3.30 | 2015JP-spray | |
5.11 | 4.32 | 2016JP-spray | ||||
6.66 | 5.83 | 2018DT-natural | ||||
8.14 | 7.26 |
a p, the statistical p-value for the significance of the odds ratio in the GWAS. b r2 (%), phenotypic variance (%) explained by the peak markers. Bold QTNs indicate that the markers can be located by GWAS under both artificial inoculation and natural morbidity conditions. The significant associated region was 1.39 Mb upstream and downstream of the most significantly associated QTN positions.