Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 25;17:32. doi: 10.1186/s13000-022-01211-w

Table 1.

Inter-assay summary data for replicates 1 and 2 vs 3 and 4 were used for the evaluation of Class call concordance. 30 FFPE available samples were run in duplicate, for a total of 4 replicates, over 2 days by two different technologists and using two different machines. The individual sample class call averages of the replicates are shown

Avg Class Call for Replicates
Sample 1&2 3&4 Concordant
1 Class 1 Class 1 Yes
2 Class 1 Class 1 Yes
3 Class 2A Class 2A Yes
4 Class 1 Class 1 Yes
5 Class 1 Class 1 Yes
6 Class 1 Class 1 Yes
7 Class 1 Class 1 Yes
8 Class 2A Class 2A Yes
9 Class 1 Class 1 Yes
10 Class 1 Class 1 Yes
11 Class 1 Class 1 Yes
12 Class 1 Class 1 Yes
13 Class 1 Class 1 Yes
14 Class 1 Class 1 Yes
15 Class 2A Class 1 No*
16 Class 1 Class 1 Yes
17 Class 1 Class 1 Yes
18 Class 1 Class 1 Yes
19 Class 2A Class 2A Yes
20 Class 1 Class 1 Yes
21 Class 2A Class 2A Yes
22 Class 1 Class 1 Yes
23 Class2B Class2B Yes
24 Class 2A Class2B No*
25 Class 2A Class 2A Yes
26 Class2B Class2B Yes
27 Class 1 Class 1 Yes
28 Class 2A Class 2A Yes
29 Class2B Class2B Yes
30 Class2B Class 2A No**

*Not concordant

**Excluded, dilution error