Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 11;14(4):691. doi: 10.3390/polym14040691

Table 4.

Comparison of transport properties for the membranes in pervaporation dehydration of ethylene glycol (10 wt.% water).

Membrane Temperature, °C Permeation Flux, g/(m2·h) Separation Factor (β) Reference
Dense membranes
PPO/GO (0.7%) 22 78 4491 This study
PIM-1 (polymer of intrinsic microporosity) 30 51 39 [7]
PPO/heteroarm stars with C60 center (5%) 50 21 11,240 [23]
Polybenzimidazole/polyetherimide dual-layer hollow fiber membrane 60 115 1763 [13]
Supported membranes
PPO/GO (0.7%)/MFFC 22 180 4082 This study
Polyethylenimine-poly(acrylic acid) (PEI/PAA) complex/PA 22 12 415 [12]
PVA/buckypaper 30 26 802 [4]
1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate-PVA (70/30)/buckypaper 30 102 1014
Chitosan/PS 35 300 104 [10]
PVA/PS 60 360 987 [60]
Polyelectrolyte complex/GO (3 wt.%)/PS 60 961 1191 [11]
GFT1001 (PVA/PAN) 75 244 1116 [61]
GFT1000 (PVA/PAN) 75 56 141
GFT1510 (PVA/PAN) 75 1700 591
DEG167 (PVA/PAN) 75 500 991