Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 21;14(2):462. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020462

Table 4.

Relative lesion area evolution during the DMBA/TPA-induced skin carcinogenesis model in mice.

Group Parameter Experimental Week
21th 22th 23th 24th 27th Δ Average c
G2 RLA a 11.4 ± 6.7 13.9 ± 8.1 13.1 ± 8.3 15.9 ± 8.4 19.3 ± 2.8 -
Δ b - 2.5 ± 5.3 1.7 ± 4.8 4.5 ± 12.6 8.1 ± 9.4 3.2 ± 8.1
G4 RLA a 3.3 ± 3.2 *** 3.0 ± 2.3 *** 5.0 ± 4.8 *** 3.3 ± 1.7 *** 5.2 ± 1.0 *** -
Δb - 0.0 ± 2.0 1.8 ± 3.4 −0.1 ± 2.1 2.5 ± 1.6 0.9 ± 2.7

Results expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 10 animals/group with macroscopic lesions from 17 animals) of relative lesion area in mice (male Balb/c). Parameters: a RLA = Relative lesion area, evaluated by comparing the lesion area to a standard square ruler photographed together with each mouse. Photos analyzed by using ImageJ software; b Δ = difference between RLA at an experimental week and at 21st experimental week (starting treatment); c Δ average = average increasing rate per week. Experimental weeks: S21–S23 = BCM device treatment; S24–S27 = recovering time. Experimental groups: G2 = unloaded BCM device with skin cancer induction; G4 = AgNMS@BCM device with skin cancer induction. Samples: BCM = unloaded bacterial cellulose membrane; AgNMS = nimesulide-silver complex; AgNMS@BCM = bacterial cellulose membrane loaded with AgNMS 1 mg/cm2. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test (*** p < 0.001).