Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 11;14(4):755. doi: 10.3390/nu14040755

Table 3.

Effect of supplementation on fatigue in four groups.

Variables (Unit) Time NMN_AM A NMN_PM B Placebo_AM C Placebo_PM D Main Effect of Group
p-Value
Main Effect of Time
p-Value
Interaction
p-Value
(Groups × Times)
Post Hoc Analysis with
Bonferroni Correction
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
Drowsiness (point) Pre § 9.7 ± 3.8 10.0 ± 3.5 8.5 ± 2.9 9.1 ± 3.5 0.05 <0.01 0.02 B, D: Mid, Post < Pre
Mid: D < A
Mid § 10.3 ± 3.9 8.3 ± 2.9 8.6 ± 2.6 7.1 ± 2.5
Post § 9.4 ± 3.8 7.9 ± 2.9 7.5 ± 2.5 7.5 ± 2.6
d 0.08 0.64 0.37 0.50
Instability (point) Pre 8.1 ± 3.1 8.4 ± 3.0 8.4 ± 2.9 8.1 ± 3.9 0.70 <0.01 0.33
Mid 8.5 ± 3.4 7.3 ± 2.9 7.2 ± 1.8 7.0 ± 2.8
Post 7.8 ± 2.7 7.6 ± 2.6 7.5 ± 2.3 6.9 ± 2.8
d 0.09 0.29 0.34 0.36
Uneasiness (point) Pre 7.1 ± 2.1 7.1 ± 2.4 7.4 ± 2.3 7.3 ± 3.0 0.64 0.10 0.47
Mid 7.6 ± 2.8 6.5 ± 1.8 7.0 ± 2.3 6.5 ± 2.5
Post 7.0 ± 1.9 6.6 ± 2.5 7.0 ± 2.3 6.3 ± 2.0
d 0.04 0.21 0.16 0.37
Dullness (point) Pre 9.7 ± 3.7 10.1 ± 4.3 10.4 ± 3.7 10.2 ± 3.4 0.88 0.03 0.35
Mid 10.1 ± 3.8 9.1 ± 4.0 9.8 ± 2.9 8.9 ± 3.0
Post 9.2 ± 3.5 9.2 ± 5.0 10.1 ± 4.1 9.2 ± 3.1
d 0.14 0.18 0.09 0.31
Eyestrain (point) Pre 10.4 ± 4.6 10.1 ± 4.9 10.0 ± 4.3 10.1 ± 3.9 0.86 0.27 0.58
Mid 10.7 ± 5.1 9.9 ± 4.8 9.6 ± 4.3 9.6 ± 4.0
Post 10.0 ± 4.7 10.4 ± 5.2 8.9 ± 3.5 9.5 ± 3.6
d 0.10 0.06 0.30 0.15
Total fatigue score (point) Pre § 45.3 ± 15.1 45.7 ± 15.5 44.8 ± 12.5 44.8 ± 14.5 0.64 <0.01 0.19
Mid § 47.3 ± 16.3 41.1 ± 12.6 42.3 ± 9.6 39.0 ± 12.5
Post § 43.5 ± 13.0 41.8 ± 15.7 41.0 ± 11.6 39.5 ± 11.2
d 0.13 0.25 0.31 0.41

Note: Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance, d: effect size (Cohen’s d), Pre vs. Post (0.2: small, 0.5: medium, 0.8: large), §: 26 participants. Higher points of all variables mean worse fatigue. A: NMN_AM, B: NMN_PM, C: Placebo_AM, D: Placebo_PM.