Table 2.
The effects of different NaCl concentrations in RIM on the RFW and RDW.
| NaCl Concentrations, mM | RFW, mg | RDW, mg | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Line YaLF | cv. Rekordsmen | Line YaLF | cv. Rekordsmen | |
| 0 | 17.68 l | 15.97 kl | 1.19 l | 0.95 k |
| 25 | 14.08 jk | 11.61 ij | 0.78 ghijk | 0.78 hijk |
| 50 | 7.44 fgh | 8.37 gh | 0.67 fghi | 0.85 ijk |
| 75 | 6.54 efgh | 8.37 h | 0.57 fg | 0.91 jk |
| 100 | 4.78 cdef | 5.39 defg | 0.47 cdef | 0.55 def |
| 150 | 1.77 ab | 3.35 bcd | 0.24 b | 0.55 ef |
| 200 | 0.07 a | 0.91 ab | 0.02a | 0.14 ab |
| 250 | – | 0.70 ab | – | 0.08 ab |
Notes: «–», no root formation. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at α = 0.05 according to the Duncan’s multiple range test (n = 30).