Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 17;29(2):191–201.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2021.07.010

Table 1.

Dose-response phenotype of CRISPR-edited cell lines

Compound 3D7-A10 parent EC50 ± SDa (nM) Dd2-B2 parent EC50 ± SDa (nM) Dd2:A597V (CRISPR edited) EC50 ± SDa (nM) Dd2:T648M (CRISPR edited) EC50 ± SDa (nM)
MMV019721 400 ± 58 (n = 3) 400 ± 72 (n = 4) 6,200 ± 94 (n = 4) 8,200 ± 1,700 (n = 3)
MMV084978 110 ± 28 (n = 3) 150 ± 36 (n = 4) 43,000 ± 6,800 (n = 3) 12,000 ± 1,200 (n = 4)
Mefloquine 18 ± 4.6 (n = 5) 15 ± 5.7 (n = 4) 31 ± 17 (n = 4) 20 ± 11 (n = 4)
Atovaquone 0.42 ± 0.05 (n = 3) 0.30 ± 0.13 (n = 4) 0.55 ± 0.35 (n = 4) 0.69 ± 0.38 (n = 4)
Dihydroartemisinin 2.6 ± 1.6 (n = 3) 4.6 ± 3.0 (n = 5) 5.6 ± 3.5 (n = 4) 3.7 ± 3.0 (n = 4)
Amodiaquine 7.4 ± 1.8 (n = 5) 19 ± 6.0 (n = 4) 21 ± 2.5 (n = 4) 20 ± 8.6 (n = 4)

Data presented as mean ± SD with n bioreplicate assays.

a

SD, standard deviation.