Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 30;14(2):332. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020332

Table 1.

Mean diameter, size distribution, and surface charge of zein- and gliadin-based nanoparticles prepared in different polar media.

Composition of the Aqueous Phase Mean Sizes
(nm)
Polydispersity
Index (PdI)
Z-Potential
(mV)
Zein a
H2O (MilliQ) 133 ± 1 0.164 ± 0.007 −34 ± 3
Saline solution 0.9% w/v 472 ± 243 ** 0.509 ± 0.22 ** −7 ± 1
Glucose solution 5% w/v 127 ± 1 * 0.137 ± 0.04 −31 ± 1
PBS 0.01 M pH 7.4 >1000 ** 0.870 ± 0.170 ** −10 ± 2
Gliadin b
H2O (MilliQ) 143 ± 3 0.128 ± 0.01 −28 ± 2
Saline solution 0.9% w/v 794 ± 10 ** 0.512 ± 0.03 ** −8 ± 1
Glucose solution 5% w/v 169 ± 2 * 0.194 ± 0.01 * −22 ± 2
PBS 0.01 M pH 7.4 784 ± 35 ** 0.680 ± 0.04 ** −10 ± 3

a Zein-based nanoparticles prepared with 2 mg/mL of protein and 1.25% w/v of SD. b Gliadin-based nanoparticles prepared with 1 mg/mL of protein and 0.1% w/v of SRBO2. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.001 with respect to the formulation prepared in MilliQ water. The DLS analysis was performed in the same medium used for sample preparation.