Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 25;26(8):615–625. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02600-5

Table 2.

Efficacy outcomes (intervention period)

All (n = 228) Group A
(n = 155)
Group B
(n = 73)
p
Therapeutic success—n (%)
 Yes 213 (93.4) 144 (92.9) 69 (94.5) 0.646
 No 15 (6.6) 11 (7.1) 4 (5.5)
Number of treatment sessions—Mean ± SD 1.51 ± 0.74 1.43 ± 0.65 1.68 ± 0.86
1 session—n (%) 145 (63.6) 103 (66.5) 42 (57.5) 0.013
2 sessions—n (%) 50 (21.9) 38 (24.5) 12 (16.4)
3 sessions—n (%) 33 (14.5) 14 (9.0) 19 (26.0)
Polidocanol dosage (total)—Mean ± SD 22.6 ± 10.9 22.5 ± 10.5 22.9 ± 11.7 0.763
Bleeding grade variation*—Mean ± SD − 1.54 ± 0.71 – 1.39 ± 0.70 − 1.85 ± 0.64  < 0.001
Sodergren score variation*—Mean ± SD − 7.31 ± 3.70 – 7.14 ± 3.70 − 7.67 ± 3.70  < 0.001

SDstandard deviation

*Variable computed as measurement in the end of the intervention period minus baseline

Tests used to compare variables between groups: T test (Average number of treatment sessions; Polidocanol dosage, Sodergren score variation); Mann–Whitney test (Bleeding grade variation, Goligher grade variation); Chi-square test (Therapeutic success)