Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 31;8(2):150. doi: 10.3390/jof8020150

Table 3.

Terbinafine MICs (mg/L) in relation to SQLE profiles of Trichophyton isolates. The EUCAST tECOFFS are inserted as dotted red lines.

Species SQLE Profile
(Genbank Accession)
MIC (mg/L) N % NWT
/SQLE
≤0.004 0.008 0.016 0.03 0.06 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 >4 NP
T. rubrum F397L (OM313306/OM313307) 1 2 1 6 1 3 14 60.8
F397I (OM313305) 1 1 2
L393F (OM313304) 2 2
L393S (OM313303) 2 5 7
Y414C/L438C (OM313302) 1 1
F415S (OM313301) 1 1
F415V (OM313300) 1 1
L437P (OM313299) 1 1
H440Y (OM313298) 1 1
I479V (OM313297) 1 1
WT (OM313296) 1 3 7 6 1 2 20
T. indotineae F397L (OM313310/ OM313311) 2 2 1 5 63.6
L393F (OM313308) 1 1
F397L/A448T (OM313309) 1 1
T. interdigitale WT (OM313312) 1 1 2 4
T. benhamiae WT (OM313313) 1 1 0
Trichophyton spp. Total 2 4 11 7 1 2 7 4 3 9 5 8 63 60.3

NP: Not possible. T. interdigitale isolates were considered WT if below the T. indotineae tECOFF and having a unimodal distribution. Numbers in red indicate isolates that are NWT, whereas numbers in green indicate WT isolates. Finally, numbers in orange indicate isolates with classification mismatch between SQLE profile and phenotypic resistance.