Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 14;10(2):24. doi: 10.3390/sports10020024

Table 2.

Risk of bias assessments following criteria from ROBINS-I tool 2.

Article 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total
Aloui et al. (2019) [26] L L L L L L L L
Baker, J.A (1992) [27] L L L S L L M S
Batalha et al. (2018) [28] L L L L L L L L
Bussey, H.I (2000) [29] L L L L L L L L
Behm, D.G. (1991) [6] L L L L L L L L
Cho et al. (2018) [30] L L L L L L L L
Escamilla et al. (2010) [31] L L L L L L L L
Fernandez et al. (2013) [32] L L L L L L L L
Gibson, T.S. (2002) [33] L L L L L L L L
Hibberd et al. (2010) [34] L L L L L L L L
Kim et al. (2018) [35] L L L L L L L L
Knerr, S.A (1995) [36] L L L L L L L L
Lima et al. (2018) [37] L L L L L L L L
Magnus et al. (2014) [38] L L L L L L L L
Markovic et al. (2016) [39] L L L L L L L L
Mascarin et al. (2017) [40] L L L L L L L L
Page et al. (1993) [17] L L L L L L L L
Picha et al. (2019) [41] L L L M L L L M
Pourtaghi et al. (2017) [42] L L L L L L L L
Richards, J.A. (2009) [43] L L L L L L L L
Sugimoto et al. (2006) [44] M L M L L L L M
Thiebaud et al. (2013) [45] L L M L M L L M
Treiber et al. (1998) [7] L M L L M L L M
Vaezi et al. (2015) [46] L L M L L L L M

2 Bias Domains: (1) Bias due to confounding; (2) bias in selection of participants to the study; (3) bias in classification of interventions; (4) bias due to deviations from intended interventions; (5) bias due to missing data; (6) bias in measurement of outcomes; (7) bias in the selection of the reported result. Total score is the highest risk value across domains. L = low; M = moderate; S = serious risk of bias.