Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 12;23(4):2057. doi: 10.3390/ijms23042057

Table 1.

Comparison of L- and D-AvBD103b with other antimicrobial compounds, which we previously studied with the same technique (real-time fluorescence video microscopy, on living bacteria) and under the exact same conditions (30 °C, EZRDM buffer solution at pH 7.4).

Antimicrobial Compound
(Charge, Hydrophobicity)
Observation of Periplasmic Bubbles
(Duration)
Event1: OM Permeabilization
(GFP Leak to Surroundings)
Event2: CM Permeabilization
(Sytox Increase)
Concomitance of Event 1 and Event 2 Halt of Growth or
Cell Shrinkage
and Correlation with Event 1
Refs
LL-37
(+6, 35%)
No Very High High No Cell shrinkage correlates with event 1 [43]
Cecropin A
(+6, 48%)
No Very High Weak No Cell shrinkage correlates with event 1 [52,84]
Melittin
(+6, 46%)
Yes
(<24 s)
High High Yes Cell shrinkage correlates with event 1 [45]
MM63:CHx37
(mean charge +22)
Yes Weak High No Cell shrinkage precedes event 1 [48,85]
L-AvBD103b
(+10, 47%)
Yes
(minutes)
Weak Weak Yes Halt of growth precedes event 1 This work
D-AvBD103b
(+10, 47%)
Yes
(minutes)
Weak Weak Yes Halt of growth precedes event 1 This work