Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 14;12(2):219. doi: 10.3390/membranes12020219

Table 1.

The outcome of FDR in the pure furcation defect group based on treatment strategies.

LFI RLI ALF ARL IRI
Mean ± SD p Mean ± SD p Mean ± SD p Mean ± SD p Mean ± SD p
Overall 1.45 ± 1.15 mm 50 ± 40% 1.59 ± 1.21 mm 43 ± 31% 1.05 ± 0.19
BRG Autograft 0.68 ± 1.00 mm 0.039 * 16 ± 25% 0.003 ** 1.00 ± 1.10 mm 0.195 28 ± 28% 0.185 0.98 ± 0.15 0.043 *
FDBA 1.77 ± 1.08 mm 52 ± 34% 1.78 ± 1.89 mm 57 ± 66% 1.25 ± 0.26
DBBM 1.74 ± 1.11 mm †† 64 ± 38% 1.82 ± 1.09 mm 47 ± 23% 1.04 ± 0.17
CM 1.27 ± 1.03 mm 0.589 38 ± 36% 0.287 1.58 ± 1.31 mm 0.967 52 ± 44% 0.321 1.10 ± 0.26 0.394
EMD 1.52 ± 1.20 mm 54 ± 41% 1.60 ± 1.20 mm 40 ± 26% 1.02 ± 0.25

Abbreviations: LFI: the linear furcation regeneration improvement; RLI: the ratio of LFI; ALF: the adjusted LFI; ARL: the adjusted ratio of LFI; IRI: the improvement of radiographic intensity; BRG: the bone replacement graft; FDBA: freeze-dried bone matrix; DBBM: deproteinized bovine bone matrix; CM: collagen membrane; EMD: enamel matrix derivatives. Significant difference in the strategy: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; Significant difference to autograft treatment: p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01.