Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 14;12(2):219. doi: 10.3390/membranes12020219

Table 6.

Logistic regression for the effects of the demographic characteristics, treatment strategies, furcation–ABC relationship, and AIDR in achieving a better outcome of FDR in the combined furcation–angular defect group.

LFI > 1.03 mm RLI > 40% ALF > 1.30 mm ARL > 30% IRI > 1.011
OR [Range] p OR [Range] p OR [Range] p OR [Range] p OR [Range] p
≥ 52 year-old vs. < 52 year-old 1.66 [0.48–5.73] 0.424 0.46 [0.15–1.39] 0.168 1.03 [0.32–3.29] 0.965 0.54 [0.18–1.68] 0.290 1.11 [0.30–4.13] 0.877
Male vs. female 2.73 [0.79–9.37] 0.111 1.60 [0.55–4.64] 0.387 0.65 [0.21–2.03] 0.456 0.95 [0.32–2.84] 0.930 1.47 [0.41–5.29] 0.558
DBBM vs. autograft/FDBA 1.79 [0.52–6.15] 0.357 1.40 [0.44–4.43] 0.565 1.62 [0.49–5.37] 0.430 1.18 [0.37–3.80] 0.778 1.33 [0.39–4.53] 0.653
EMD vs. CM 2.73 [0.78–9.61] 0.118 1.68 [0.56–5.04] 0.357 1.58 [0.49–5.11] 0.447 1.83 [0.59–5.69] 0.297 2.20 [0.63–7.65] 0.217
Degree II FI vs. degree III FI NA NA 1.95 [0.24–15.99] 0.535 NA NA NA NA NA NA
First molar vs. second molar 0.58 [0.13-2.57] 0.475 0.41 [0.12–1.41] 0.156 0.36 [0.09–1.38] 0.136 0.52 [0.15–1.83] 0.308 1.41 [0.43–4.62] 0.573
FF-ABC ≥ 0.5 mm vs. <0.5 mm 0.87 [0.23-3.33] 0.835 0.60 [0.17–2.10] 0.421 1.08 [0.29–4.02] 0.906 0.86 [0.24–3.10] 0.816 2.99 [0.64–14.01] 0.166
BF-ABC ≥ 0.5 mm vs. <0.5 mm 0.13 [0.02-1.06] 0.057 1.36 [0.30–6.21] 0.693 0.86 [0.17–4.23] 0.849 1.58 [0.34–7.38] 0.558 0.44 [0.10–2.00] 0.288
AIDR > 0 mm vs. AIDR ≤0 mm 2.98 [0.90-9.82] 0.073 1.70 [0.55–5.26] 0.357 5.13 [1.56–16.84] 0.007 ** 3.79 [1.18–12.15] 0.025 * 1.64 [0.48–5.56] 0.432

Abbreviations: LFI: the linear furcation regeneration improvement; RLI: the ratio of LFI; ALF: the adjusted LFI; ARL: the adjusted ratio of LFI; IRI: the improvement of radiographic intensity; BRG: the bone replacement graft; FDBA: freeze-dried bone matrix; DBBM: deproteinized bovine bone matrix; CM: collagen membrane; EMD: enamel matrix derivatives; FF-ABC: the distance between FF and ABC; AIDR: the adjacent intrabony defect regeneration; NA: not applicable due to very limited pairs for the comparison. Significant difference: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.