Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 19;23(4):2312. doi: 10.3390/ijms23042312

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effect of GBM morphology on tensile properties of PEG/GBM composite hydrogels. (A) YM, (B) UTS and (C) EB of neat PEG hydrogels, 0.1, 0.5 and 1% FLGO and 0.1, 1, 2 and 4% GO composite hydrogels. At least two technical replicates and two independent experiments for FLGO composites: Kruskal–Wallis analysis, Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, # p< 0.05 vs. neat PEG hydrogels. Five technical replicates and two independent experiment for GO composites: one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, * p < 0.05 vs. neat PEG hydrogels.