Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 25.
Published in final edited form as: Res Eval. 2019 Jun 14;28(3):279–289. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvz012

Table 2.

TREC constituents’ agreement with roles and responsibilities supporting CC functioning

CC functional areaa Corresponding CC member roles and responsibilities Agree n (%)
Leadership and administration Provide infrastructure for between-site collaboration 54 (98.2)
Plan scientific meetings 50 (90.9)
Arrange conference calls 48 (87.3)
Coordinate webinars 48 (87.3)
Manage website 47 (87.0)
Manage listserv 47 (85.5)
Serve as a liaison with funders 41 (74.6)
Respond to site needs and problem-solving 39 (70.9)
Data and bioinformatics Assist with data management 41 (75.9)
Assist with data analysis 27 (49.1)
Developmental projects Coordinate pilot project RFAs 48 (87.3)
Lead development of pilot project RFAs 42 (76.4)
Education and training Offer training on how to integrate disciplinesa 43 (78.2)
Provide guidance on integrated disciplinary approachesa 38 (69.1)
Offer skills training 35 (63.6)
Provide scientific expertise in initiative content areas 33 (60.0)
Provide scientific mentorship 32 (59.3)
Offer discipline-specific training 26 (48.2)
Integration and self-evaluation Provide a broad perspective of initiative activities 44 (80.0)
Assist sites with gauging transdisciplinary progressa 38 (69.1)
Suggest midcourse corrections 38 (69.1)
Develop transdisciplinary evaluation metricsa 36 (65.5)

Notes: Rows may not sum to 58 due to missing data. Responses do not differ between TREC investigators and NCI program staff based on Fisher’s exact tests.

a

Functional areas correspond to TREC CC cores.