Table 3.
Multivariable regression analysis on the need for a permanent pacemaker and on paravalvular leakage
Pacemaker implantation OR (95% CI) |
p-value | |
---|---|---|
Type of THV used | ||
Evolut R | 1.00 (reference) | – |
CoreValve | 2.79 (1.31–5.94) | 0.008 |
Evolut PRO | 1.18 (0.52–2.71) | 0.69 |
Male gender | 0.71 (0.36–1.42) | 0.33 |
RBBB at baseline | 14.44 (5.59–37.28) | <0.005 |
LAFB at baseline | 1.28 (0.46–3.61) | 0.64 |
AV1B at baseline | 3.36 (1.64–6.87) | 0.001 |
Mean depth of implantation (mm) | 1.21 (1.09–1.34) | <0.005 |
Annular sizing ratio | 0.17 (0.002–11.700) | 0.41 |
Peripheral artery disease | 1.70 (0.91–3.18) | 0.098 |
Moderate or severe PVL OR (95% CI) |
p‑value | |
Type of THV used | ||
Evolut R | 1.00 (reference) | – |
CoreValve | 2.06 (0.79–5.39) | 0.14 |
Evolut PRO | 0.53 (0.16–1.77) | 0.30 |
Bicuspid valve (functional) | 1.51 (0.46–4.96) | 0.49 |
Annular sizing ratio | 0.02 (0.000–5.410) | 0.18 |
Post-dilatation | 5.56 (2.23–13.86) | <0.005 |
Variables are shown as OR (95% CI)
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, THV transcatheter heart valve, RBBB right bundle branch block, LAFB left anterior fascicular block, AV1B first-degree atrioventricular block, PVL paravalvular leakage