Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 Feb 25;12:2882. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06812-5

A Middle Pleistocene wolf from central Italy provides insights on the first occurrence of Canis lupus in Europe

Dawid A Iurino 1,, Beniamino Mecozzi 1,2,, Alessio Iannucci 1,2, Alfio Moscarella 1,2, Flavia Strani 1,2, Fabio Bona 3, Mario Gaeta 2, Raffaele Sardella 1,2
PMCID: PMC8881584  PMID: 35217686

Abstract

Here, we describe a partial cranium of a large canid dated at 406.5 ± 2.4 ka from the Middle Pleistocene of Ponte Galeria (Rome, Italy). The sample represents one of the few Middle Pleistocene remains of a wolf-like canid falling within the timeframe when the Canis mosbachensisCanis lupus transition occurred, a key moment to understand the spread of the extant wolf (Canis lupus) in Europe. CT-based methods allow studying the outer and inner cranial anatomy (brain and frontal sinuses) of a selected sample of fossil and extant canids. Morphological and biometric results allowed to: (I) ascribe the cranium from Ponte Galeria to an adult Canis lupus, representing the first reliable occurrence of this taxon in Europe; (II) provide the content for a biochronological revision of the Middle Pleistocene record of European wolves.

Subject terms: Palaeontology, Evolution, Zoology

Introduction

The ecological plasticity, the pack hunting abilities and the complex social structure are just some of the traits that contribute to making the wolf (Canis lupus, Linnaeus, 1758) the most widespread and iconic representative of the genus Canis, with a considerable impact on the collective human imagination over the centuries1. The European fossil record of Late Pleistocene C. lupus is remarkable in terms of number of remains and their preservation, offering a privileged context for investigating the paleobiology of the wolf25, as well as the early human-wolf interactions and the origin of the domestic dog69. Moving back to the Middle Pleistocene, our knowledge on the origin of C. lupus in Europe is instead limited due to the paucity of fossil remains10,11.

Although there are a few remains attributed to C. lupus from the late Early Pleistocene of North America12, there is broad consensus in considering the Early to Middle Pleistocene Mosbach wolf (Canis mosbachensis, Soergel, 1925) the ancestor of C. lupus, with a replacement occurred in Europe during the Middle Pleistocene ca. 450–350 ka (MIS 12-MIS 9)1113. The first occurrence (FO) of the modern wolf is one of the defining bioevents of the faunal turnover that took place during the transition between the Galerian and Aurelian European Land Mammal Ages (ca. 400 ka), characterized by the earliest dispersal of several modern mammal taxa in Europe1417. Despite being intensively investigated from taxonomic, morphological and biochronological perspectives, European Middle Pleistocene wolves have been attributed either to C. mosbachensis or C. lupus mainly due to their size4,13,1821. An increase in dimensions is usually recorded across the Middle Pleistocene, with the largest Canis reported during the end of the Late Pleistocene (C. l. maximus, sensu Brugal and Boudadì-Maligne2). The morphological differences between C. mosbachensis and C. lupus have long been vaguely defined (Supplementary Note 1), as the remains of wolf-like canids from the Middle Pleistocene of Europe are mainly of poor taxonomic value (Fig. 1). As pointed out by Mecozzi et al.10, some fossil and extant C. lupus frequently share C. mosbachensis-like characters. Most importantly, there is overlap in tooth size between these two species, leading to uncertain taxonomic attributions. Aside from the Ostiense cranium (456–416 ka, MIS 11)2, which represents the last occurrence (LO) of C. mosbachensis in Europe, other informative cranial remains far predate the crucial period from MIS 12 to MIS 9, when the Canis mosbachensis-Canis lupus transition occurred11,13,19.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Cranial remains of Middle Pleistocene wolf-like canids from Europe at the time of the Canis mosbachensisCanis lupus transition (for the complete list see Supplementary Table S1). Map of Europe modified from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Europe_blank_map.png, artwork by D.A. Iurino.

The earliest customarily accepted record of Canis lupus was that of Lunel-Viel (France), referred to MIS 11 (ca. 400 ka) and interpreted as a chronosubspecies of the wolf, C. lupus lunellensis22. Given the relatively small size of the remains, they would have fitted in a scenario of a progressive size increase in the C. mosbachensisC. lupus lineage, being interpreted as one of the last-surviving populations of small-sized wolves22—although notably the possibility of a synonymy with the Mosbach wolf has been suggested by Kurtén23. However, the estimated antiquity of Lunel-Viel was based on biochronological inference and new studies are pointing to a younger age, likely MIS 9-724,25. During MIS 11-9, canid samples from well temporally constrained deposits of Europe are lacking, with the only exception of the nearly complete skull of C. lupus from La Polledrara di Cecanibbio (Rome, Italy) (340–320 ka, MIS 9)26. This specimen has not been described yet, although it has been figured and ascribed to C. lupus by Anzidei et al.26.

In this scenario, the sample (PF-PG1) collected from the area of Ponte Galeria (Rome, Italy) is relevant because it represents one of the few Middle Pleistocene crania of a wolf-like canid and offers an unique opportunity to enrich our knowledge on the C. mosbachensis-C. lupus transition in Europe. The first CT-based description of the inner and outer cranial anatomy of the specimen from Ponte Galeria is offered here, providing the content for a biochronological revision of the Middle Pleistocene record of European wolves.

Geological framework

Since the beginning of 1960s, the sedimentary sequence of Ponte Galeria, located in the west area of Rome (Fig. 2), represents one of the richest paleontological localities of the Italian Peninsula. Ponte Galeria is considered a reference for biochronological and paleoecological studies of European Middle Pleistocene faunas, and give its name to the homonym biochronological unit (Ponte Galeria Faunal Unit). The term Galerian, now widely adopted as a Mammal Age, was introduced by Ambrosetti et al.27 to define a peculiar late Early–Middle Pleistocene faunal assemblage recovered from the area14,28. Here, several fossiliferous localities are known spanning in age from the late Early Pleistocene to the late Middle Pleistocene29. Among them, those referred to MIS 11-9 are: Castel di Guido, Fontignano 2, Malagrotta, La Polledrara di Cecanibbio, San Cosimato, Torre in Pietra—lower levels3032. During this time span, proboscideans, hippopotamuses, cervids and bovids are well documented, whereas the record of carnivorans is quite poor. Lower Paleolithic tools were found at Castel di Guido31,33, La Polledrara di Cecanibbio26, Malagrotta31 and Torre in Pietra (lower levels)34.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Geographic location of Ponte Galeria area. Map of Italy modified from https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Italy_map_with_regions.svg, map of Rome modified from the Carta Tecnica Regionale 2014 del Lazio, foglio 386—Lido di Ostia—https://geoportale.regione.lazio.it/layers/geodbgt:geonode:curve_livello#more.

Results

Age of the Ponte Galeria wolf

PF-PG1 was recovered during rescue surveys between the 1970s and 1980s. Unfortunately, as for other remains collected during quarry activities in those years, the exact location and stratigraphic provenance of PF-PG1 were not recorded and the specimen is simply labelled as from "Ponte Galeria". However, this region is rich in geochronologically calibrated continental deposits younger than ca. 800 ka35,36. The cavities of the cranium are infilled by whitish and highly vesicular pumice clasts (Fig. 3), whose geochemical characterization allows correlation with the Vico β pyroclastites erupted at 406.5 ± 2.4 ka (Supplementary Note 2, Supplementary Figs. S1, S2 and Supplementary Table S2).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

PF-PG1 specimen from Ponte Galeria. Upper portion of the cranium in dorsal (A), ventral (B), left lateral (C) and right lateral (D) views, with close-up of the encrusting sediment. Basicranium in dorsal (E) and ventral (F) views with a close-up of the left tympanic bulla filled by pumice clasts, occipital condyles in posterior view (G), right tympanic bulla in ventral view (H). Scale bar: 50 mm.

Outer cranial anatomy

The specimen PF-PG1 (Figs. 3, 4) consists of a partial braincase divided into four fragments of different size. The surface of the fragments is covered by a thin and irregular encrusting patina of volcanic ash, light grey in color. The coarse volcanic sediment is mostly located within the tympanic bullae, while it is less abundant inside the frontal bone. The specimen has completely fused cranial sutures, which is compatible with the adult condition, and it shows no signs of bone alterations or transport (weathering or abrasion).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Virtually restored model of PF-PG1 specimen from Ponte Galeria in dorsal (A), ventral (B), anterior (C), posterior (D), left lateral and right lateral views. Scale bars: 50 mm. Reconstruction sequence of the head appearance of PF-PG1. Artwork by D.A. Iurino.

The postorbital constriction is wide (even if preserved only on the left side), the slightly marked left temporal line ending posteriorly to a long and well-developed sagittal crest. The neurocranium is fairly inflated in dorsal view. The frontals are convex and elevated, whereas the sagittal crest is quite robust and the projection posterior end exceeds the occipital condyles in lateral view. The retroarticular process is robust as well the mastoid one, whereas the opening of the acoustic meatus is oval with antero-ventral to postero-dorsal major axis. Posteriorly, the braincase is rounded and has a rough surface, with a marked nuchal crest. The foramen magnum is oval and elongated laterally, the occipital condyles are laterally and dorsally projected and the nuchal tubercle is weak. The tympanic bullae are partially broken. They are antero-medially to postero-laterally elongated, their anterior borders are aligned with the retroarticular processes, and their medial walls are parallel in ventral view. PF-PG1 shows frontal bones slightly convex in lateral view, similarly to those of other fossil and extant specimens of C. lupus, but differing from the condition of C. mosbachensis, where the frontals are less prominent10,13 (Supplementary Fig. S3). The medial wall of the tympanic bullae is divergent in the Ponte Galeria specimen, similarly to those of C. lupus and C. mosbachensis13.

Biometric comparison

Cranial measurements of PF-PG1 (Fig. 5, Supplementary Table S3) falls within the range of extant C. lupus italicus for all the considered variables. In the GMB-HOT plot, PF-PG1 is larger than specimens from Lunel-Viel and Grotta Romanelli, ranking close to those of Covoli di Velo, Grotta Ladrenizza and extant C. lupus italicus (Fig. 5). A similar arrangement is observable in the GMB-GBOC plot, except for a single specimen from Lunel-Viel which is nearly as large as those from Covoli di Velo, Grotta Ladrenizza and Ponte Galeria. In GBOC-HOT, GBOC-GBFM and HFM-GBFM plots, C. lupus from Grotta Romanelli and C. mosbachensis from Cerè fall outside or within the lower portion of the range of extant C. lupus italicus (Fig. 5). The specimen of C. lupus maximus from Grotte de Jaurens is the largest among the analyzed sample and falls outside the range of the extant Italian wolf. In GDAB-GBFM and GDAB-GBOC plots (Fig. 5) the fossil samples from Covoli di Velo, Grotta di Ladrenizza, Grotta Romanelli and Ponte Galeria, fall within the smallest extant C. lupus italicus, with PF-PG1 placed in an intermediate position between Covoli di Velo and Grotta Ladrenizza (larger), and Grotta Romanelli (smaller).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Bivariate plots of cranial measurements of fossil and extant canids. GDAB Greatest diameter of the auditory bulla, GMB Greatest mastoid breadth, GBOC Greatest breadth of the occipital condyles, GBFM Greatest breadth of the foramen magnum, HFM Height of the foramen magnum, HOT Height of the occipital triangle. Measurements are reported in Supplementary Table S3.

Frontal sinuses

The specimen PF-PG1 shows a well-developed left frontal sinus (Fig. 6) extending from the antorbital constriction up to the fronto-parietal suture. In dorsal view, its anterior portion—between the preorbital constriction and the zygomatic process of the frontal—is laterally expanded, lobed and crossed by a deep transverse groove, while the caudal one—between the zygomatic process of the frontal and the fronto-parietal suture—is narrower, less lobed, with a compact and smooth surface (Fig. 6). In lateral view, the sinus is triangularly shaped and quite domed. The frontal sinus as it appears in Fig. 6, is 43.7 mm long and 19.1 mm wide (the comparative list of measurements is reported in Supplementary Table S4), reaching almost half the length of the brain endocast. In dorsal view, it covers the whole anterior portion of the brain extending to the cruciate sulcus, while laterally it completely covers the orbital gyrus.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Comparative morphology of the frontal sinuses of PF-PG1 from Ponte Galeria and a selected sample of fossil and extant canids (the complete list of specimens is reported in Supplementary Table S4). Sale bar: 50 mm.

The frontal bone of the Ponte Galeria specimen contains a large frontal sinus, morphologically similar to those of fossil (Grotta Romanelli) and extant C. lupus (e.g., C. lupus italicus, C. lupus lycaon, C. lupus baileyi) (Fig. 6). According to Curtis and Van Valkenburgh37, the frontal sinuses of C. lupus are the largest among all living canids, representing a peculiarity of the species. Frontal sinuses of L. pictus are strongly lobed, reduced in size and placed between the preorbital and postorbital constriction. In dorsal view they do not reach the fronto-parietal suture nor the cruciate sulcus of the brain, while in lateral view they do not fully cover the orbital gyrus (Fig. 6). Considering canids of smaller sizes, such as C. aureus, C. latrans and Lupulella mesomelas, their frontal sinuses are strongly reduced with a simplified morphology. They are dorsally flat with a smooth surface, and they never reach the fronto-parietal suture nor the cruciate sulcus of the brain (Fig. 6).

Brain

Processing CT-images, we obtained a partial brain endocast (Fig. 7) consisting of an upper left hemisphere with clearly visible convolutions, and a portion of the right one, which shows a smoother surface and less marked sulci. The olfactory bulbs, most of the anterior left hemisphere, the entire basal portion of the cerebrum and almost all the cerebellum are missing. The brain endocast, as it appears in Fig. 7, is 74.1 mm long and 57.2 mm wide (the comparative list of measurements is reported in Supplementary Table S5). In dorsal view, a poorly marked longitudinal fissure divides the telencephalon into two almost symmetrical hemispheres with convolutions represented—from front to back—by the orbital, prorean, lateral, sigmoid, coronal, endolateral, ectolateral, suprasylvian and ectosylvian gyri, including the respective sulci (for the complete list of the brain convolutions see Fig. 7). In dorsal and lateral views, the brain is morphologically similar to the sample from Grotta Romanelli and to those of the extant C. lupus italicus, C. lupus lycaon, C. lupus baileyi and C. simensis. In these specimens, the frontal pole cortex is antero-posteriorly elongated, the orbital gyrus is laterally expanded forming a quite developed “bump” bounded by the intraorbital sulcus, the prorean gyrus is long and bilaterally constricted. Moreover, the orbital region is characterized by the presence of three main sulci: the prorean sulcus, the intraorbital sulcus and a third sulcus. According to Lyras and Van der Geer38 the third sulcus is considered typical of C. lupus, C. simensis and C. rufus. In the remaining species of our comparative sample the frontal pole is less elongated, and the orbital gyri are delimited in C. latrans and L. pictus by the prorean and intraorbital sulcui, while in C. aureus and Lupulella mesomelas only by the prorean sulcus. On the left hemisphere of extant C. lupus italicus, C. lupus lycaon and L. pictus a small dimple is detectable on the anterior portion of the coronal gyrus which is missing in the rest of the sample, including the specimen from Ponte Galeria and the fossil wolf from Grotta Romanelli and C. lupus baileyi. This feature was reported by Radinsky39 and Lyras40 only in C. lupus, Cuon alpinus and L. pictus and according to the authors it seems to be missing in all other canid species. In Grotta Romanelli and Ponte Galeria specimens, the surface irregularities of the brain endocasts do not allow the identification of this character, which however is not recognizable in C. lupus baileyi despite the good quality of the brain model. The brain volume of the specimen from Ponte Galeria has not been measured due to the incompleteness of the endocast.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Comparative brain morphology of PF-PG1 specimen from Ponte Galeria and a selected sample of fossil and extant canids (the complete list of specimens is reported in Supplementary Table S5). The black arrows indicate a prominent orbital gyrus distinctive of Canis lupus and C. simensis. The sample is normalized.

Discussion

The wolf from Ponte Galeria dated at ca. 407 ka represents the largest cranial remain of a Middle Pleistocene canid known to date in Europe. Due to the fragmentary nature of the specimen, CT-based methods have been used to acquire a wider set of morphological data, including those offered from the brain and frontal sinuses. The sample from Ponte Galeria shows the following wolf-like features: (I) elevated frontal bones, (II) well-developed sagittal and occipital crests, (III) large and domed frontal sinus which extends to the fronto-parietal suture reaching the cruciate sulcus of the brain, (IV) rostral pole of the brain antero-posteriorly elongated with the orbital gyrus laterally expanded. In size, the specimen PF-PG1 is larger than C. mosbachensis, matching the values of moderately large individuals of C. lupus (Fig. 5), while morphologically it is almost indistinguishable from the extant wolf and it appears more robust compared to C. mosbachensis (Supplementary Fig. S3). In the latter species, the frontals are less swollen than in Canis lupus, suggesting a lower extension of the frontal sinuses. Strongly pneumatized and dorsoventrally expanded frontals are considered a distinctive trait of the wolf, since this species possesses the largest frontal sinuses among all extant canids37. Although frontal sinuses of C. mosbachensis have never been formally described, Tedford et al.12 indicates that in this species the frontal sinuses are large, but they never reach the fronto-parietal suture—character 34(2) of their phylogenetic analysis—as instead occurs in the wolf—character 34(3). Large sinuses have been found throughout our sample of Late Pleistocene and extant C. lupus (Fig. 6), thus confirming the consistency of the character 34(3) scored by Tedford et al.12 for C. lupus. In the sample of Ponte Galeria, the left frontal sinus is large, domed and extends up to the fronto-parietal suture, perfectly corresponding in size and shape to those of the wolf (Fig. 6).

The neuroanatomy of fossil canids was explored by few authors4,3841 and studies on extensive fossil specimens have never been performed. Additionally, no brain endocasts of Middle Pleistocene wolf-like canids have been documented in Europe. As a result, our knowledge of the brain anatomy of C. mosbachensis and early C. lupus is limited. The partial brain endocast of PF-PG1, with an age of ca. 407 ka, fills this gap and appears as a brain of an extant wolf. The overall size, the antero-posteriorly elongated frontal pole cortex, the convolution pattern and the presence of a marked orbital gyrus bounded by the three sulci, one of which—the third sulcus, is considered typical of C. lupus, C. simensis and C. rufus38, point out the morphological affinities with the wolf (Fig. 7). Studies on the brain anatomy of social carnivorans evidenced a possible relation between the development of the frontal pole cortex and sociality. For instance, in domestic dogs the precruciate and prorean gyri are involved in social action and interaction42, the prorean gyrus has been also linked to the emergence of pack structure in canid evolution43, and in extant Crocuta crocuta the expansion of the frontal cortex has been linked to increased sociality44. In PF-PG1 the overall development of the rostral portion of the brain, including the orbital, precruciate and prorean gyri, matches the proportions of C. lupus and C. simensis, which are both able to form packs spanning from 3 to more than 13 individuals, depending on food availability45. Hence the morphological resemblance with PF-PG1 allows to assume that such pack structures were already present in Middle Pleistocene wolves of Europe, although additional paleoneurological studies on the frontal cortex of fossil canids are required to consolidate this hypothesis.

Considering the above, we ascribe the Ponte Galeria specimen to an adult Canis lupus. We excluded the attribution to Canis mosbachensis because in this hypothesis the specimen from Ponte Galeria would represent the largest and most robust cranial remain of C. mosbachensis ever recorded, contradicting what is generally claimed for this species, namely that it is slender and of a size comparable to that of the extant subspecies C. lupus pallipes11. It could be argued that size alone should not be taken as a valid criterion for specific distinction, especially considering the huge biometric and morphological variability observed between different populations of extant C. lupus. The Mosbach wolf has often been considered a chronosubspecies of the wolf, C. lupus mosbachensis23,46, a view that only after the description of the large sample from the Early Pleistocene of Untermassefeld became less widespread11,12 (Supplementary Note 1). Emerging data on dental remains of Middle Pleistocene canids from Mediterranean Europe, further support a close ancestor-descendent relation with C. lupus and confirm the difficulties in identifying valuable diagnostic characters for C. mosbachensis4,10,47. In wide-ranging mammals like C. lupus the body size is known to vary according to several factors, for instance reflecting ecomorphological adaptations to different environments or climatic conditions, the availability of trophic resources, and competition with sympatric species. Investigating size fluctuations through time adds a dimension of complexity while not excluding factors that operate across other scales. Increasingly, many studies recognized differences between trends advocated for explaining the general evolution of large mammal species and fluctuations that become evident at a closer geographical scale, as for instance documented in Europe for the spotted hyena48, the wild boar49 and the horse50. As for C. lupus, differences in size fluctuations through time were noted even comparing the geographically close fossil records of France and Italy51. However, recognizing the complex interplay of these factors in explaining the observed variation in C. lupus underlines a striking contrast with the lower dimensional variability of C. mosbachensis. Samples assigned to the Mosbach wolf span in chronology about twice the time from the FO of C. lupus to the present day, and yet none of them includes outliers of a large size comparable to that of subsequent populations of C. lupus11,19,52. The problem arises when approaching the “transitional” period of the late Middle Pleistocene, with forms of intermediate size such as C. lupus lunellensis that can be hardly significantly separated on a biometrical ground10,19,22,23. Although it cannot be completely ruled out that some Middle Pleistocene forms of C. mosbachensis may have reached a large body size, a significant preservation bias is unlikely considering the abundance of dental remains in the early Middle Pleistocene10,19,53. A potential explanation may rest on the faunal turnover occurred at the time of the FO of C. lupus, the Galerian-Aurelian transition, which saw the extinction of several large-sized carnivorans14. This renewal may have open new niches for an opportunistic predator to be exploited, hence eventually promoting local adaptations in size in different ecological scenarios.

The Ponte Galeria wolf is dated close to the Mid-Brunhes Event (ca. 424 ka; MIS 12–11 transition), which marks the end of the Early-Middle Pleistocene Transition and the consolidation of the glacial cycles ruled by a 100 kyr periodicity54. After this transition an increase in the amplitude of interglacials is recorded with one of the longest and warmest interglacial occurring right after the extreme MIS 12 glacial, during MIS 1155. In central Italian Peninsula, MIS 11 seems to have been characterized by a marked seasonality, as suggested by the analysis of the diets of fossil herbivorous ungulates from Fontana Ranuccio (408 ± 10 ka; Anagni, Central Italy)56, and by pollen-based climate reconstructions of Combourieu-Nebout et al.57, in which the lowest winter temperatures of all the examined Middle Pleistocene interglacials are inferred during MIS 11 (in the Boiano locality; Campobasso, Central Italy). The earliest dispersal of C. lupus is one of the bioevents selected to define the beginning of the Aurelian Mammal Age of the Italian large mammal biochronological scale14. Two additional taxa appeared during the Aurelian, Megaloceros giganteus and Ursus spelaeus, but studies of the last decades suggest an older diffusion, occurred during MIS 11 and MIS 13, respectively29,58. After Gliozzi et al.14, many studies added important information on the timing of dispersals or extinction of several large mammals59,60. During MIS 13–10, multiple key bioevents occurred in Europe favoring the spread of Bos primigenius32, Equus hydruntinus61 and Dama clactoniana62,63, evidencing how terrestrial ecosystems were strongly affected by the Mid-Brunhes Event. Considering the large turnover recorded during the Mid-Brunhes Event, it is thus possible that the severe glacial conditions of MIS 12 may have played a role in triggering the spread of large-sized wolves, and/or that the warmer and seasonal conditions started after MIS 12 favored the establishment of viable populations. The presence of morphologically modern wolves in North America in the late Early Pleistocene12 and the abundance of C. mosbachensis in East Asia during the early Middle Pleistocene64 suggest a dispersion of C. lupus into Europe, rather than a local origin of a modern phenotype. In this scenario large-sized wolves may have dispersed into Europe encountering or even interbreeding with populations of C. mosbachensis previously inhabiting the region. The impoverishment in the carnivoran guild may have favored the spread of these newcomers14, as well as allowing them to occupy a wider range of niches compared to C. mosbachensis. Considering dental measurements, large-sized wolves are documented since MIS 8-7 in Europe52,53, but the Ponte Galeria cranium supports an earlier arrival of C. lupus during MIS 11, ca. 400 ka. To better understanding the tempo and mode of the acquirement of the modern phenotype along and before the C. mosbachensis-C. lupus transition, and possibly of the origin of the wolf, CT-based studies of Early to Middle Pleistocene wolf-like canids are needed.

Concluding, PF-PG1 attests the presence of modern wolf-like morphologies in Europe at 406.5 ± 2.4 ka, suggesting a climate-induced turnover between the latest Early to early Middle Pleistocene forms of C. mosbachensis and those succeeding referable to C. lupus. It remains to be clarified whether C. mosbachensis represents a reliable taxonomic entity or it should rather be considered an early morphotype of C. lupus.

Material and methods

Studied material

The studied specimen belongs to the fossil mammal collection of the Museo Universitario di Scienze della Terra (MUST), Sapienza University of Rome, and consists of a fragmented neurocranium (PF-PG1) of a wolf-like canid from the Middle Pleistocene of Ponte Galeria. The sample of CT-scanned crania includes: the Middle Pleistocene specimen PF-PG1 from Ponte Galeria; the Late Pleistocene Canis lupus P3580 from Grotta Romanelli (n 1)4; extant Canis lupus italicus (n 7); Canis lupus lycaon (n 1); Canis lupus baileyi (n 1); Lycaon pictus (n 1); Canis simensis (n 1); Canis latrans (n 1); Canis aureus (n 4); Lupulella mesomelas (n 1). Morphological and biometric data collected from the literature include: Canis mosbachensis from Cerè65 and L’Escale19; C. lupus lunellensis from Lunel-Viel19; C. lupus from Grotta Romanelli4; C. lupus from Covoli di Velo and Gotta Ladrenizza65; Canis lupus maximus from Jaurens66; extant C. lupus italicus65. According to Driesch67, 7 cranial variables have been considered (Supplementary Table S3).

CT-scanning and digital restoration

Tomographic images of Canis lupus lycaon, Canis lupus baileyi and Canis simensis were downloaded from MorphoSource.org (ark:/87602/m4/M113796, ark:/87602/m4/M114099, ark:/87602/m4/M113802). Tomographic images of the rest of the sample were taken using a Philips Brilliance CT 64-channel scanner at M.G. Vannini Hospital (Rome). The cranial fragments were scanned together in the coronal slice plane from front to back. The slice thickness is 0.67 mm with an interslice space of 0.33 mm. No skulls of Canis mosbachensis were available for the examination of the frontal sinuses and the brain. CT image processing and measurements of the frontal sinuses (Supplementary Table S4) and brains (Supplementary Table S5) have been acquired using Mimics 21.0. Each fragment of the studied braincase has been digitally reconnected matching the complementary fragments. The high correspondence of the bone margins and the use of 3D reference skulls of both extant and fossil wolves, allowed to obtain a restored 3D model of the Ponte Galeria specimen. The process of fragment alignment was carried out with ZBrush 4R6. The restored model generated during the current study is available in the MorphoSource repository (ark:/87602/m4/408336).

Analytical methods

Before CT scan the specimen has been sampled. The volcanoclastic matrix occurring in the internal and external parts of the skull was gently removed from the bone using a thin blade. The sediment was split at the binocular, and volcanic components were picked and mounted as polished and carbon-coated thin section. Texture was observed at the Department of Earth Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, using the polarized optical microscope and the FEI Quanta 400 electron microscope. EMP analyses of glasses were carried out at the CNR-Istituto di Geologia Ambientale e Geoingegneria di Roma, with a Cameca SX50 electron microprobe equipped with five wavelength dispersive spectrometers (WDS). Quantitative analyses were performed using 15 kV accelerating voltage and 15 nA beam current. As standards we employed metals for Mn and Cr, Jadeite for Na, Wollastonite for Si and Ca, Orthoclase for K, Corundum for Al, Magnetite for Fe, Rutile for Ti, Periclase for Mg, F-apatite for P, phlogopite for F, potassium chloride for Cl, barite for S. Counting times for all elements were 20 s on peak and half time on both backgrounds. Light elements (Na, K) were counted first to prevent loss by volatilization. The PAP correction method was used. Glasses were analyzed using a beam diameter of 15 µm to minimize alkali loss. In order to evaluate the accuracy of the analyses, repeated analyses of three international secondary standards (Kakanui augite, Iceladic Bir-1 and rhyolite RLS glasses from USGS) were made prior to any series of measurements. The mean precision from the standard value was about 1% for SiO2, 2% for Al2O3, 5% for K2O, CaO and FeO, and 8–10% for other elements. Moreover, the analytical precision (2 sigma error) is ≤ 1% for elements in the concentration range > 10 wt.% oxide, 5% for elements in the range 2–10 wt.% oxide and better than 10% for elements in the range 0.5–2 wt.% oxide.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Rossella Carlini from the Museo Civico di Zoologia of Rome for the support in analyzing osteological collections. To Massimiliano Danti from the Vannini Hospital of Rome, who gave us access, assistance and facilities for the CT scan analysis. The study was funded by: Grandi Scavi 2018 (SA1181642D3B3C58), 2019 (SA11916B513E7C4B), 2020 (SA120172B2C05E68) of Sapienza, University of Rome (resp. RS). Outreach material for this study was produced within the project funded by the “Cinque per mille” Research Grant of Sapienza University of Rome on Earth Sciences and the Sustainable Development Goals (resp. FS).

Author contributions

D.A.I. designed and directed the research, prepared figures. D.A.I., B.M., A.I. and F.S. wrote the manuscript. D.A.I. and A.M. analyzed the CT images. B.M. collected data and performed biometric analyses. M.G. performed geochemical analyses. F.B. and R.S. gave critical ideas and comments on data analysis and manuscript writing. All authors contributed equally to the interpretation of results and discussed, revised, and finalized the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Dawid A. Iurino, Email: dawid.iurino@uniroma1.it

Beniamino Mecozzi, Email: beniamino.mecozzi@uniroma1.it.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-06812-5.

References

  • 1.Fritts SH, Stephenson RO, Hayes RD, Boitani L. 12. Wolves and humans. In: Mech LD, Boitani L, editors. Wolves. University of Chicago Press; 2010. pp. 289–316. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brugal JP, Boudadì-Maligne M. Quaternary small to large canids in Europe: Taxonomic status and biochronological contribution. Quat. Int. 2011;243:171–182. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Flower LO, Schreve DC. An investigation of palaeodietary variability in European Pleistocene canids. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2014;96:188–203. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sardella R, Berte D, Iurino DA, Cherin M, Tagliacozzo A. The wolf from Grotta Romanelli (Apulia, Italy) and its implications in the evolutionary history of Canis lupus in the Late Pleistocene of Southern Italy. Quat. Int. 2014;328:179–195. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mecozzi B, Bartolini Lucenti B. The Late Pleistocene Canis lupus (Canidae, Mammalia) from Avetrana (Apulia, Italy): reappraisal and new insights on the European glacial wolves. Ital. J. Geosci. 2018;137:138–150. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ciucani MM, et al. Old wild wolves: ancient DNA survey unveils population dynamics in Late Pleistocene and Holocene Italian remains. PeerJ. 2019;7:e6424. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Verginelli F, et al. Mitochondrial DNA from prehistoric canids highlights relationships between dogs and South-East European wolves. Mol. Bio. Evol. 2005;22(12):2541–2551. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Boschin F, et al. The first evidence for Late Pleistocene dogs in Italy. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69940-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Thalmann O, et al. Complete mitochondrial genomes of ancient canids suggest a European origin of domestic dogs. Science. 2013;342(6160):871–874. doi: 10.1126/science.1243650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mecozzi B, Iurino DA, Profico A, Rosa C, Sardella R. The wolf from the Middle Pleistocene site of Ostiense (Rome): The last occurrence of Canis mosbachensis (Canidae, Mammalia) in Italy. Hist. Biol. 2020;33(10):2031–2042. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sotnikova M. Remains of Canidae from the lower Pleistocene site of Untermassfeld. In: Kahlke RD, editor. Das Pleistozn von Untermassfeld bei Meiningen (Thüringen) Teil 2. Habelt Verlag; 2001. pp. 607–632. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tedford RH, Wang X, Taylor BE. Phylogenetic systematics of the North American fossil caninae (Carnivora: canidae) Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 2009;325:1–218. doi: 10.1206/574.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bartolini Lucenti S, Alba DM, Rook L, Moyà-Solà S, Madurell-Malapeira J. Latest Early Pleistocene wolf-like canids from the Iberian Peninsula. Quat. Sci Rev. 2017;162:12–25. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.02.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gliozzi E, et al. Biochronology of selected Mammals. Molluscs and Ostracodes from the Middle Pliocene to the Late Pleistocene in Italy. The state of the art. Riv. Ital. Paleontol. S. 1997;103(3):369–388. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Di Stefano G, Petronio C, Sardella R. Biochrnology of the Pleistocene mammal faunas from Rome Urban Area. Alp. Mediterr. Quat. 1998;11(2):191–199. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Palombo MR. Twenty years later: Reflections on the Aurelian European Land Mammal Age. Alp. Mediterr. Quat. 2018;21:177–180. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Strani F, et al. Palaeoenvironments of the MIS 15 site of Cava di Breccia—Casal Selce 2 (central Italian Peninsula) and niche occupation of fossil ungulates during Middle Pleistocene interglacials. Hist. Biol. 2021 doi: 10.1080/08912963.2021.1935920. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Torre D. Affinità dentali del cane della grotta di l’Escale. Riv. Ital. Paleontol. S. 1974;80(1):147–156. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Boudadì-Maligne, M. Les Canis pleistocenes du sud de la France: Approche biosystematique, evolutive et biochronologique. PhD Dissertation, Université Bordeaux 1. (2010).
  • 20.Ghezzo E, Berté DF, Sala B. The revaluation of Galerian Canidae, Felidae and Mustelidae of the Cere cave (Verona, Northeastern Italy) Quat. Int. 2014;339:76–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Argant A. Biochronologie et grands mammifères au Pléistocène moyen et supérieur en Europe occidentale: l’apport des Canidés, des Ursidés et des Carnivores en général. Quaternaire. Revue de l’Association française pour l’étude du Quaternaire. 2009;20(4):467–480. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bonifay MF. Carnivores quaternaires du Sud-Est de la France. Éditions du Muséum; 1971. pp. 43–377. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kurtén B. Pleistocene Mammals of Europe. Weidenfield & Nicholson; 1968. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Uzunidis-Boutillier A. Grands herbivores de la fin du Pléistocène moyen au début du Pléistocène supérieur dans le Sud de la France. Implications anthropologiques pour la lignée néandertalienne. Bull. Soc. Prehist. Francaise. 2018;115(1):154–156. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Brugal JP, et al. Pleistocene herbivores and carnivores from France: An updated overview of the literature, sites and taxonomy. Annales de Paléontologie. 2020;106(2):102384. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Anzidei AP, et al. Ongoing research at the late Middle Pleistocene site of La Polledrara di Cecanibbio (central Italy), with emphasis on human–elephant relationships. Quat. Int. 2012;255:171–187. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ambrosetti P, Azzaroli A, Bonadonna FP, Follieri M. A scheme of Pleistocene chronology for the Tyrrhenian side of central Italy. Boll. Soc. Geol. Ital. 1972;91:169–184. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sardella R, Bedetti C, Iurino DA, Pavia M, Bellucci L. Comment on “Reassessing the sedimentary deposits and vertebrate assemblages from Ponte Galeria area (Rome, central Italy): An archive for the middle pleistocene faunas of Europe” by F. Marra, L. Pandolfi, C. Petronio, G. Di Stefano, M. Gaeta & L. Salari. Earth Sci. Rev. 2015;147:201–203. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Marra F, et al. Major explosive activity in the Monti Sabatini Volcanic District (central Italy) over the 800–390 ka interval: Geochronological-geochemical overview and tephrostratigraphic implications. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2014;94:74–101. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Marra F, et al. A review of the geologic sections and the faunal assemblages of Aurelian Mammal Age of Latium (Italy) in the light of a new chronostratigraphic framework. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2018;181:173–199. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Villa P, et al. Elephant bones for the Middle Pleistocene toolmaker. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(8):e0256090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Iannucci A, Mecozzi B, Sardella R. Large mammals from the Middle Pleistocene (MIS 11) site of Fontignano 2 (Rome, central Italy), with an overview of “San Cosimato” assemblages. Alp. Mediterr. Quat. 2021;34(1):155–164. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Boschian G, Saccà D. In the elephant, everything is good: Carcass use and re-use at Castel di Guido (Italy) Quat. Int. 2015;361:288–296. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Caloi L, Palombo MR. Anfibi, rettili e mammiferi di Torre del Pagliaccetto (Torre in Pietra, Roma) in Torre in Pietra, Roma. Quaternaria. 1978;20:315–428. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pereira A, et al. Tephrochronology of the central Mediterranean MIS 11c interglacial (~ 425–395 ka): New constraints from the Vico volcano and the Tiber delta, central Italy. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2020;243:106–470. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Monaco L, et al. Mediterranean tephrostratigraphy and peri-Tyrrhenian explosive activity revaluated in light of the 430–365 ka record from Fucino Basin (central Italy) Earth Sci. Rev. 2021;220:103706. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Curtis AA, Van Valkenburgh B. Beyond the sniffer: frontal sinuses in Carnivora. Anat. Rec. 2014;297(11):2047–2064. doi: 10.1002/ar.23025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lyras GA, Van Der Geer AAE. External brain anatomy in relation to the phylogeny of Caninae (Carnivora: Canidae) Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2003;138:505–522. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Radinsky L. Evolution of the Canid Brain. Brain Behav. Evol. 1973;7:169–202. doi: 10.1159/000124409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lyras GA. The evolution of the brain in Canidae (Mammalia: Carnivora) Scr. Geol. 2009;139:1–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ivanoff DV, Wolsan M, Marciszak A. Brainy stuff of long-gone dogs: A reappraisal of the supposed Canis endocranial cast from the Pliocene of Poland. Sci. Nat. 2014;101(8):645–651. doi: 10.1007/s00114-014-1200-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hecht EE, et al. Significant neuroanatomical variation among domestic dog breeds. J. Neurosci. 2019;39(39):7748–7758. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0303-19.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Radinsky LB. Outlines of canid and felid brain evolution. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1969;167(1):277–288. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Holekamp KE, Sakai ST, Lundrigan BL. Social intelligence in the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2007;362(1480):523–538. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wilson DE, Mittermeier RA. Handbook of the Mammals of the World, Carnivores. Lynx Edicions; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Thenius E. Die Caniden (Mammalia) aus dem Altquartar von Hundsheim (Niederosterreich) nebst Bemerkungen zur stammesgeschichte der Gattung Cuon. Neues Jahrb. für Geol. Paläontol. 1954;99:230–286. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mecozzi B, Iurino DA, Bertè DF, Sardella R. Canis mosbachensis (Canidae, Mammalia) from the Middle Pleistocene of Contrada Monticelli (Putignano, Apulia, southern Italy) Boll. Soc. Paleontol. Ital. 2017;56(1):71–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Klein RG, Scott K. Glacial/interglacial size variation in fossil spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) from Britain. Quat. Res. 1989;32:88–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Iannucci A, Sardella R, Strani F, Mecozzi B. Size shifts in late middle Pleistocene to early Holocene Sus scrofa (Suidae, Mammalia) from Apulia (southern Italy): Ecomorphological adaptations? Hystrix. 2020;31:10–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Uzunidis A. Middle Pleistocene variations in the diet of Equus in the South of France and its morphometric adaptations to local environments. Quaternary. 2021;4(3):23. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sansalone G, Berte DF, Maiorino L, Pandolfi L. Evolutionary trends and stasis in carnassial teeth of European Pleistocene wolf Canis lupus (Mammalia, Canidae) Quat. Sci. Rev. 2015;110:36–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Van der Made J, Stefaniak K, Marciszak A. The Polish fossil record of the wolf Canis and the deer Alces, Capreolus, Megaloceros, Dama and Cervus in an evolutionary perspective. Quat. Int. 2014;326:1–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Turner A. The evolution of the guild of large Carnivora of the British Isles during the Middle and Late Pleistocene. J. Quat. Sci. 2009;24(8):991–1005. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Head MJ, Gibbard PL. Early-Middle Pleistocene transitions: Linking terrestrial and marine realms. Quat. Int. 2015;389:7–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Weirauch D, Billups K, Martin P. Evolution of millennial-scale climate variability during the mid-Pleistocene. Paleoceanography. 2008;23:PA3216. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Strani F, et al. Ungulate dietary adaptations and palaeoecology of the Middle Pleistocene site of Fontana Ranuccio (Anagni, Central Italy) Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2018;496:238–247. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Combourieu-Nebout N, et al. Climate changes in the central Mediterranean and Italian vegetation dynamics since the Pliocene. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2015;218:127–147. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Stewart JR. The progressive effect of the individualistic response of species to Quaternary climate change: An analysis of British mammalian faunas. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2008;27(27–28):2499–2508. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Palombo MR, Valli AMF. Remarks on the biochronology of mammalian faunal complexes from the Pliocene to the Middle Pleistocene in France. Geol. Romana. 2004;37:145–163. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Strani F, Mecozzi B, Sardella R. An overview of the Middle Pleistocene in north Mediterranean region. Alp. Mediterr. Quat. 2021;34(1):1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Boulbes N, Van Asperen EN. Biostratigraphy and palaeoecology of European Equus. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2019;7:301. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Breda M, Lister AM. Dama roberti, a new species of deer from the early Middle Pleistocene of Europe, and the origins of modern fallow deer. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2013;69:155–167. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Mecozzi B, Iannucci A, Mancini M, Sardella R. Redefining Ponte Molle (Rome, central Italy): An important locality for Middle Pleistocene mammal assemblages of Europe. Alp. Mediterr. Quat. 2021;34(1):131–154. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Jiangzuo Q, Liu J, Wagner J, Dong W, Chen J. Taxonomical revision of fossil Canis in Middle Pleistocene sites of Zhoukoudian, Beijing, China and a review of fossil records of Canis mosbachensis variabilis in China. Quat. Int. 2018;482:93–108. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bertè, D. F. L’evoluzione del genere Canis (Carnivora, Canidae, Caninae) in Italia dal wolf-event a oggi: Implicazioni biocronologiche, paleoecologiche e paleoambientali. PhD Dissertation, Sapienza: Università di Roma. (2014).
  • 66.Boudadi-Maligne M. Une nouvelle sous-espèce de loup (Canis lupus maximus nov. subsp.) dans le Pléistocène supérieur d’Europe occidentale. C. R. Palevol. 2012;11(7):475–484. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Von den Driesch A. A Guide to the Measurement of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites: As Developed by the Institut für Palaeoanatomie, Domestikationsforschung und Geschichte der Tiermedizin of the University of Munich. Peabody Museum Press; 1976. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES