Table 3.
Correlations between connectivity matrices
| AEC-c | PLI | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD | SCD | AD | SCD | ||||
| Delta (0.5–4 Hz) |
rs = 0.74 p < 0.001* |
Delta (0.5–4 Hz) |
rs = 0.60 p < 0.001* |
Delta (0.5–4 Hz) |
rs = 0.13 p < 0.001* |
Delta (0.5–4 Hz) |
rs = 0.11 p < 0.001* |
| Theta (4–8 Hz) |
rs = 0.70 p < 0.001* |
Theta (4–8 Hz) |
rs = 0.71 p < 0.001* |
Theta (4–8 Hz) |
rs = 0.23 p < 0.001* |
Theta (4–8 Hz) |
rs = 0.09 p < 0.001* |
| Alpha (8–13 Hz) |
rs = 0.62 p < 0.001* |
Alpha (8–13 Hz) |
rs = 0.87 p < 0.001* |
Alpha (8–13 Hz) |
rs = 0.41 p < 0.001* |
Alpha (8–13 Hz) |
rs = 0.49 p < 0.001* |
| Beta (13–30 Hz) |
rs = 0.87 p < 0.001* |
Beta (13–30 Hz) |
rs = 0.82 p < 0.001* |
Beta (13–30 Hz) |
rs = 0.21 p < 0.001* |
Beta (13–30 Hz) |
rs = 0.37 p < 0.001* |
| Gamma (30–48 Hz) |
rs = 0.42 p < 0.001* |
Gamma (30–48 Hz) |
rs = 0.25 p < 0.001* |
Gamma (30–48 Hz) |
rs = 0.06 p < 0.001* |
Gamma (30–48 Hz) |
rs = 0.03 p = 0.0910 |
Spearman’s rho coefficients (d.f. 88) correlating the connectivity matrices for the test and validation cohorts, for the AD and SCD groups. On the left side, the results for the AEC-c are displayed, and on the right, the results for the PLI
*Bold print depicts a significant (p < 0.05) correlation