Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pain. 2021 Aug 27;163(6):1035–1048. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002469

Table 4.

Analysis 2 Regression Coefficient Explanations and Result Summary

Parameter
Level One Level Two Hypothesis Explanation Electrode Result
Intercept b0i Intercept γ00 Grand average unpleasantness ratings All M = 8, p<.001

Menstrual Pain γ01 Association between unpleasantness and menstrual pain All ns

Somatic Symptoms γ02 Association between unpleasantness and somatic symptoms All ns

Provoked Bladder Pain γ03 2 Association between unpleasantness and provoked bladder pain All ηp2=.06, p=.003

Brightness Slope b1i Intercept γ10 Association between unpleasantness and brightness intensity Oz ηp2=.17, p<.001

Menstrual Pain γ11 How menstrual pain affects the association between unpleasantness and brightness intensity Oz ηp2=.03, p=.03

Somatic Symptoms γ12 How somatic symptoms affect the association between unpleasantness and brightness intensity Oz ns
CP6 ηp2=.09, pfdr=.01

Provoked Bladder Pain γ13 How provoked bladder pain affects the association between unpleasantness and brightness intensity Oz ns

PSD Slope b2i Intercept γ20 3a Association between unpleasantness and cortical activity Oz ηp2=.07, p=.002

Menstrual Pain γ21 How menstrual pain affects the association between unpleasantness and cortical activity Oz ns

Somatic Symptoms γ22 How somatic symptoms affect the association between unpleasantness and cortical activity Oz ns
CP1 ηp2=.06, pfdr=.04
CP6 ηp2=.08, pfdr=.02

Provoked Bladder Pain γ23 3b How provoked bladder pain affects the association between unpleasantness and cortical activity Oz ηp2=.03, p=.03

Note. Unpleasantness refers to ratings of visual unpleasantness during the visual task. ns = not significant; fdr = false discovery rate.