Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2022 Feb 28;201(2):567–576. doi: 10.1007/s12011-022-03178-7

The Effect of Selenium Supplementation on Clinical Outcomes, Metabolic Profiles, and Pulsatility Index of the Uterine Artery in High-Risk Mothers in Terms of Preeclampsia Screening with Quadruple Test: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Selenium and preeclampsia

Elahe Mesdaghinia 1, Farah Shahin 1,, Amir Ghaderi 2, Daryoush Shahin 3, Mohammad Shariat 4, Hamidreza Banafshe 5
PMCID: PMC8882395  PMID: 35224710

Abstract

Data on the effects of selenium (Se) supplementation on clinical outcomes, metabolic profiles, and pulsatility index (PI) in high-risk mothers in terms of preeclampsia (PE) screening with quadruple tests are scarce. This study evaluated the effects of Se supplementation on clinical outcomes, metabolic profiles, and uterine artery PI on Doppler ultrasound in high-risk mothers in terms of PE screening with quad marker. The current randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted among 60 high-risk pregnant women screening for PE with quad tests. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups (30 participants each group), received either 200 µg/day Se supplements (as Se amino acid chelate) or placebo from 16 to 18 weeks of pregnancy for 12 weeks. Clinical outcomes, metabolic profiles, and uterine artery PI were assessed at baseline and at the end of trial. Se supplementation resulted in a significant elevation in serum Se levels (β 22.25 µg/dl; 95% CI, 18.3, 26.1; P < 0.001) compared with the placebo. Also, Se supplementation resulted in a significant elevation in total antioxidant capacity (β 82.88 mmol/L; 95% CI, 3.03, 162.73; P = 0.04), and total glutathione (β 71.35 µmol/L; 95% CI, 5.76, 136.94; P = 0.03), and a significant reduction in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (β − 1.52; 95% CI, − 2.91, − 0.14; P = 0.03) compared with the placebo. Additionally, Se supplementation significantly decreased PI of the uterine artery in Doppler ultrasound (β − 0.09; 95% CI, − 0.14, − 0.04; P = 0.04), and a significant improvement in depression (β − 5.63; 95% CI, − 6.97, − 4.28; P < 0.001), anxiety (β − 1.99; 95% CI, − 2.56, − 1.42; P < 0.001), and sleep quality (β − 1.97; 95% CI, − 2.47, − 1.46; P < 0.001). Se supplementation for 12 weeks in high-risk pregnant women in terms of PE screening with quad marker had beneficial effects on serum Se level, some metabolic profiles, uterine artery PI, and mental health. IRCT Registration: htpp://www.irct.ir; identifier IRCT20200608047701N1.

Keywords: Selenium, Preeclampsia, Uterine artery pulsatility index, Doppler ultrasound, Quad test, Metabolic profiles

Introduction

Preeclampsia (PE) and related hypertensive disorders of pregnancy complicate 2–5 percentages of all pregnancies in developed countries and are major contributors to maternal and neonatal morbidities and mortalities [1, 2]. PE and eclampsia rank second or third in all worldwide ranking of maternal death causes. In Iran, PE is reported to be involved in 12% of pretermed neonate deliveries and 18.2% of maternal deaths. Also, the prevalence of the disease is not equal among different ethnic groups [35]. PE is a major disease of human pregnancy, marked by hypertension and proteinuria, appearing during the second or third trimester of gestation [6, 7]. There are risk factors and clinical factors that significantly increase PE risk, including the extremes of maternal age, chronic hypertension, family predisposition for PE and eclampsia, polycystic ovarian syndrome, nulliparity, new male partner, multiple gestations, obesity, sleep disordered breathing, preexisting diabetes, and various infections such as periodontal disease, urinary tract infections, renal disease, and helicobacter pylori. Also, in terms of obstetric history, vaginal bleeding for at least 5 days during pregnancy increases PE risk [8, 9]. Despite several studies on PE, its exact etiology remains poorly understood. However, it is known that placental changes occur early in pregnancy, associated with an imbalance between the antioxidant defense system, and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) characterizing oxidative stress. Also, there is a generalized inflammatory process, as well as the presence of progressive vascular endothelial damage, which culminates in placental dysfunction [10, 11]. However, the placenta is naturally protected by some antioxidant defenses. These antioxidant enzymes’ defense systems help to prevent the placenta from undue harm. This is the basis of the involvement of micronutrients and other antioxidants in the etiopathogenesis of PE [12]. In addition, hypertension, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, endothelial dysfunction, dysfunction hemoglobin, platelets, hepatic transaminases, protein/creatinine ratio, and uric acid, and vascular impairment have all been observed in PE [13]. Also, PE has negative effects on the psycho-emotional state (depression and anxiety), sleep patterns, and psychopathological symptoms [14, 15].

Se is an essential micronutrient, which plays an important role in preserving many natural body functions. The biological function of Se is related to its incorporation through selenocysteine (SeCys) into the structure of proteins important for metabolism [1618]. Se is present in both inorganic and organic forms. The organic form is the Se contained in amino acids termed as selenomethionine (SeMet) and SeCys, while the inorganic forms (e.g., selenate, selenite, selenide, and elemental Se). The inorganic form of Se is a major source of dietary Se in the human population. Animals that are raised on Se-containing soil are a rich source of selenoproteins (SePs) [16, 19]. SePs play various functions in the human body, including cell signaling and redox reactions, selenium transport (selenoprotein P), and activation and proliferation of immune cells (selenoprotein K) [17, 20]. It constitutes an integral part of selenoproteins and some antioxidant enzymes such as thioredoxin reductase (TRxR), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and iodothyronine deiodinase (DIO), which protect cells from the damaging effects of free radicals produced during oxidation [16]. Also, Se is a component of other enzymes, particularly DIO which catalyzes the deionization of thyroxine (T4) to triiodothyronine (T3). Deiodinases play a key role in the regulation of thyroid hormones. They are responsible for the control of proper growth, development, and cell metabolism [16]. Additionally, Se plays a key role in the immune system regulation. The element stimulates the immune system to enhance the production of antibodies (IgM and IgG) and causes enhanced activity of macrophages and T cells [21]. Also, the protective effects of Se in the etiology of cancer result from its effect on cell membranes protecting against oxidative stress, and the stabilizing effect on DNA and increase of cellular immune response. It has been indicated that Se inhibits tumor cell proliferation via the effect exerted on Bcl-2 apoptosis suppressor gene and the expression of p53 tumor suppressor gene [18, 22]. Protein hydrophobic interactions induced by a variety of nutritional and environmental factors can provide rational explanation for a number of pathologic conditions. The deficiency of Se leads to elevated pathological changes, inflammation, and oxidative stress [23, 24]. Several studies have assessed the relationship between the level of body Se and the incidence, severity, and mortality of different disease such as cancer, COVID-19, Alzheimer, respiratory diseases, hepatic diseases, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), cardiovascular disorders, neurologic, and other degenerative diseases [2529].

Previous studies have reported controversial results between Se levels and PE, recurrent abortions, and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) [30, 31]. Se is a component of some vital enzymes that play roles in the antioxidant activities, so if serum values of these enzymes are low, it can result in numerous pathways that can lead to PE [32]. Also, with increased understanding of the pathogenesis of PE, clinical prediction models of the disease have gradually diversified. Doppler has more recently shown some promise [33]. First and second trimester uterine artery Doppler assessments have high predictive value for clinical outcome (prediction of PE and IUGR) [34]. Uterine artery PI has been used as a marker of PE and fetal growth restriction (FGR), in the presence of which PI increases due to the elevation in uterine artery impedance [35]. Combination of the clinical, biochemical, and biophysical markers is likely to increase the predictive power of screening examinations [36]. Currently, the implementation of serum biomarker screening quad test (AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; BHCG, beta-human gonadotropin; uE3, unconjugated estriol; and IHA, inhibin-A) for fetal aneuploidy has commenced worldwide, and many studies have shown that additional information derived from such screenings, other than aneuploidy risk estimation, can also be used to identify the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes, such as fetal growth restriction, PE, and preterm birth [37, 38].

The hypothesis of this clinical trial is that clinical outcomes, metabolic profiles, PI of uterine artery, and mental health might improve among high-risk mothers in terms of PE screening with quadruple tests. A literature review revealed limited information about the effects of Se on clinical profiles, mental health, PI and metabolic biomarkers in high-risk mothers screening with quadruple tests. Therefore, in this clinical trial, we aimed to evaluate the effects of Se in pregnant women at the risk of PE screened with quad test.

Methods

Trial Design and Participants

This research was a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. The current study was done among 60 high-risk pregnant women in terms of PE that were screened by quad test, aged 18–40 years who referred to Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Kashan, Iran, between May 2020 and December 2020. Participants who consumed Se supplements during the past 12 weeks and pregnant women with diabetes mellitus, thyroid disorders, hypertension, chronic proteinuria, abnormal scan anomaly, multiplication, AIDS, hepatitis B or hepatitis C, intolerance to yeasts containing selenium supplements, and bone and chromosomal abnormalities were excluded.

Ethics Statements

This clinical trial was done according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Kashan University of Medical Sciences (IR.KAUMS.MEDNT.REC.1399.008) and registered on the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials website (http://www.irct.ir: IRCT20200608047701N1). All subjects provided informed written consent before recruitment.

Clinical Trial Procedures

Randomization was done using computer-generated random numbers by a trained staff at the obstetrics and gynecology clinic. Randomization and allocation were concealed to the researchers and participants until the final analyses were completed. Another person at the clinic, who was not involved in the trial and not aware of random sequences, assigned the participants to the numbered bottles of supplement. The treatment group (n = 30) received 200 µg/day Se as Se amino acid chelate (Alfa Vitamins, Florida, USA) from 16 to 18 weeks of gestation for 12 weeks with meals. Placebo group (n = 30) received capsules in size, shape, color, packaging, taste, and smell as Se. Participants were asked not to take other Se supplements during the 12-week intervention, however maintaining their regular diet and physical activity throughout the intervention period. Adherence to supplements and placebos was determined by counting the tablet containers. To increase compliance, all participants received brief daily cell phone reminders to take the Se and Placebo.

Assessment of Anthropometric Measures

Weight and height of participants were determined in an overnight fasting status using a standard scale (Seca, Hamburg, Germany) at the baseline and after the 3-month intervention. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

Assessment of Outcomes

The primary outcome measurement was high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and the secondary outcome measurements were clinical outcomes, other metabolic profiles, and uterine artery PI.

Biochemical Measures

At first and after the end of the clinical trial, 10 mL of blood samples and a urine sample were taken from each subject at the Kashan Reference Laboratory in an early morning after an overnight fast (Kashan, Iran). Blood was collected in two separate tubes: (A) one without EDTA to separate the serum, in order to determine serum Se, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), uric acid, prolactin, and hs-CRP concentrations and (B) another one containing EDTA to examine plasma nitric oxide (NO), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), total glutathione (GSH), and malondialdehyde (MDA). Also, protein/creatinine ratio was measured in urine samples. Blood samples were immediately centrifuged (Hettich D-78532, Tuttlingen, Germany) at 3500 rpm for 10 min to separate serum and plasma. Then, the samples were stored at − 80 °C before analysis at the KUMS reference laboratory. Hemoglobin, hepatic transaminases, protein/creatinine ratio, and uric acid were measured on the day of blood and urine sampling with enzymatic kits (Pars Azmun, Tehran, Iran) with intra-assay coefficient of variations (CV s) below 5%. Platelet counts in venous whole blood samples were determined with Sysmex KX-21 Haematology analyzer (Sysmex Corporation, Japan). Also, the samples were analyzed to determine the serum Se levels, using atomic absorption spectrometry method (A Perkin-Elmer) [39]. Plasma TAC concentrations were measured using the method of ferric reduction antioxidant power developed by Benzie and Strain [40]. Plasma GSH using the method of Tipple et al. [41], and MDA concentrations by the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances spectrophotometric test were determined with inter- and intra-assay CVs below 5% [42]. A commercial ELISA kit (LDN, Nordhorn, Germany) with inter- and intra-assay CVs below 7% determined serum hs-CRP levels. The plasma NO levels were determined using Griess method [43]. Measurements of metabolic biomarkers were performed in a blinded fashion, in duplicate (pre- and post-intervention) after the intervention, in the same analytical run, and in random order to reduce systematic error and inter-assay variability.

Clinical Measures

Mean validated automated devices (3BTO-A2, Micro life, Taipei, Taiwan) measured arterial pressure. Women were in the sitting position with their arms supported at the level of the heart, and a small (22 cm), normal (22–32 cm), or large (33–42 cm) adult cuff was used, depending on the mid-arm circumference. After resting for 5 min, two recordings of blood pressure were made in both arms simultaneously. We calculated the final MAP as the average of all four measurements [44]. In the present study, Beck’s Depression (BDI), Anxiety (BAI), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) inventories were used to assess level of depression, anxiety, and sleep quality, respectively [4547]. BDI is a 21-question and BAI is a 20-question inventory, where each question scored between 0 and 4, and higher scores indicate the higher levels of depression and anxiety, respectively. The Persian versions of both inventories were validated in the previous studies [48, 49]. The PSQI includes a scoring key for calculating a patient’s seven sub-scores, each of which can range from 0 to 3. The sub-scores are tallied, yielding a “global” score that can range from 0 to 21. A global score of 5 or more indicates poor sleep quality; the higher the score, the worse the quality [47].

Radiology Measures

Trans-abdominal color Doppler ultrasound was performed before and after the intervention to evaluate the left and right uterine artery PI, and the average value was recorded. This examination was performed using trans-abdominal ultrasound with color-flow mapping. When three similar consecutive wave forms were provided, the PI was measured on each side.

Sample Size

We did not detect a similar trial about the effects of Se supplementation on uterine artery PI, clinical signs, and metabolic profiles in high-risk mothers in terms of PE screening with quad marker for determining the sample size based on primary outcome. Hence, the sample size was calculated based on the effects of Se supplementation on hs-CRP status in pregnant women at risk for intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Type one (α) and type two (β) errors were defined as 0.05 and 0.20 (power = 80%), respectively. Based on a previous study [50], we used a standard deviation (SD) of 1.8 and 1 for Se and placebo groups, and a difference in mean (d) of 1.2, considering hs-CRP as the key variable. We needed 24 patients in each group. Assuming a dropout of 6 persons per group, the sample size was considered to be 30 patients in each group.

Statistical Analyses

The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to determine the normality of data. To detect the differences in anthropometric parameters among two groups, we used the independent-samples t-test. Multiple linear regression models were used to assess treatment effects on study outcomes after adjusting for baseline concentration of variables. The effect sizes were demonstrated as the mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were done using the Statistical Package for Social Science version 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).

Results

Six subjects in the supplements group and four subjects in the placebo group dropped out for personal reasons (Fig. 1). Finally, 50 patients (selenium (n = 24) and placebo (n = 26)) completed the trial. No difference in mean age and anthropometric parameters was seen between the two groups (Table 1). Overall, the compliance rate was high, such that more than 90% of capsules were consumed throughout the study in both groups. No side effects were reported following the intake of Se in patients with PE throughout the study.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Summary of patient flow diagram

Table 1.

General characteristics of study participants

Variables Placebo Group
(N = 26)
Selenium Group
(N = 24)
p1
Age (years) 30.6 ± 0.4 30.4 ± 7.5 0.65
Height (cm) 162.4 ± 9.0 163.4 ± 3.2 0.70
Weight at the beginning of the intervention (kg) 70.14 ± 4.2 67.10 ± 3.6 0.39
Weight at the end of intervention (kg) 77.13 ± 0.1 74.10 ± 41.1 0.42
Weight changes at the beginning and end of the intervention 6.1 ± 6.2 7.1 ± 0.4 0.28
BMI at the beginning of the intervention (kg/m2) 26.4 ± 4.7 25.3 ± 2.9 0.32
Education (%)
Primary 7(26.9) 5(20.8)
Secondary 8(30.8) 9(37.5) 0.66
Diploma 2(7.7) 4(16.7)
University 9(25) 6(34.6)
Job (%)
Unemployed 21(80.8) 21(87.5) 0.39
Employed 5(19.2) 3(12.5)

1Data are mean ± SDs and percentage

2Obtained from independent t-test

Obtained from Pearson chi-square test

Se supplementation resulted in a significant improvement in depression scores (β − 5.63; 95% CI, − 6.97, − 4.28; P < 0.001), anxiety scores (β − 1.99; 95% CI, − 2.56, − 1.42; P < 0.001), and sleep quality scores (β − 1.97; 95% CI, − 2.47, − 1.46; P < 0.001) compared with the placebo (Table 2). Compared with the placebo, Se supplementation resulted in a significant elevation in TAC (β 82.88 mmol/L; 95% CI, 3.03, 162.73; P = 0.04), and GSH (β 71.35 µmol/L; 95% CI, 5.76, 136.94; P = 0.03), and a significant reduction in hs-CRP levels (β − 1.52 mg/L; 95% CI, − 2.91, − 0.14; P = 0.03). Additionally, Se supplementation significantly increased serum Se levels (β 22.25 mg/dL; 95% CI, 18.3, 26.1; P < 0.001), and a significant decrease in UAPI (β -0.09; 95% CI, − 0.14, − 0.04; P = 0.04) compared with the placebo. Se supplementation did not affect other metabolic profiles.

Table 2.

Clinical parameters, metabolic profile, uterine artery PI, and mental health scale at baseline and after 12 weeks of the intervention in high-risk pregnant women in terms of PE screening with quad marker

Variables Placebo group
(n = 26)
Selenium group
(n = 24)
Difference in outcome measures between selenium and placebo treatment groups1
Baseline Week 12 Baseline Week 12 β (95% CI) P2
Selenium)μg/l) 62.1 ± 12.4 65.7 ± 12.2 59.8 ± 8.9 85.6 ± 12.5 22.25 (18.3, 26.1)  < 0.001
Blood pressure (mmhg) 11.0 ± 9.4 11.1 ± 8.8 10.7 ± 8.4 11.2 ± 7.8 3.62 (− 0.15, 7.40) 0.06
Hemoglobin (g/dl) 12.1 ± 0.7 12.0 ± 0.7 12.4 ± 0.8 12.2 ± 0.6  − 0.05 (− 0.29, 0.18) 0.64
Platelets (× 1000/μ) 184,000 ± 46,138 181,310 ± 41,153 208,210 ± 66,153 207,670 ± 71,047 40,950.9 (− 9990.3, 18,182.2) 0.56
AST (U/l) 26.1 ± 10.4 25.9 ± 9.5 24.6 ± 8.4 26.9 ± 8.5 2.35 (− 0.65, 5.35) 0.12
ALT (U/l) 26.7 ± 9.6 28.2 ± 9.0 25.0 ± 8.8 27.6 ± 8.8 0.69 (− 2.48, 3.86) 0.66
LDH (IU/l) 265.5 ± 45.5 264.3 ± 53.1 266.5 ± 48.3 271.6 ± 45.0 6.63 (− 14.0, 27.34) 0.52
Creatinine (mg/dl) 0.7 ± 0.05 0.7 ± 0.04 0.7 ± 0.06 0.7 ± 0.05 0.003 (− 0.02, 0.02) 0.78
Uric acid (mg/dl) 3.8 ± 0.8 4.0 ± 0.6 3.8 ± 0.6 4.0 ± 0.7  − 0.08 (− 0.34, 0.17) 0.52
Urine Pr/Cr ratio 0.02 ± 0.01 0.02 ± 0.01 0.01 ± 0.01 0.02 ± 0.009  − 0.005 (− 0.01, − 0.002) 0.13
hs-CRP (mg/L) 7.5 ± 5.1 7.7 ± 4.5 9.0 ± 4.8 7.1 ± 2.5  − 1.52 (− 2.91, − 0.14) 0.03
NO (μmol/L) 65.2 ± 11.4 69.0 ± 14.1 64.0 ± 7.7 72.2 ± 11.2 4.54 (− 2.24, 11.34) 0.18
TAC (mmol/L) 715.7 ± 141.0 730.5 ± 156.2 727.9 ± 144.8 827.1 ± 236.1 82.88 (3.03, 162.73) 0.04
GSH (μmol/L) 729.2 ± 183.7 744.5 ± 183.6 742.9 ± 210.9 833.6 ± 246.8 71.35 (5.76, 136.94) 0.03
MDA (μmol/L) 4.8 ± 1.7 5.2 ± 1.7 4.9 ± 1.4 4.7 ± 1.3  − 0.57 (− 1.40, 0.25) 0.17
UAPI 1.31 ± 0.26 0.88 ± 0.13 1.34 ± 0.27 0.8 ± 0.09  − 0.09 (− 0.14, − 0.04) 0.04
Depression score 10.07 ± 5.13 10 ± 5.15 10.91 ± 3.8 4.83 ± 1.73  − 5.63 (− 6.97, − 4.28)  < 0.001
Anxiety score 8.11 ± 4.05 7.23 ± 3.46 5.79 ± 2.55 3.33 ± 2.14  − 1.99 (− 2.56, − 1.42)  < 0.001
Sleep quality 6.15 ± 3.68 5.53 ± 3.38 5.58 ± 1.97 3.04 ± 1.33  − 1.97 (− 2.47, -1.46)  < 0.001

Data are mean ± SDs

1 “Outcome measures” refers to the change in values of measures of interest between baseline and week 12. β (difference in the mean outcomes measures between treatment groups (Se group = 1 and placebo group = 0))

2Obtained from multiple regression model (adjusted for baseline values of each clinical and biochemical variables)

AST aspartate aminotransferase; ALT alanine aminotransferase; LDH lactate dehydrogenase; urine (Pr/Cr) ratio, urine (protein/creatinine) ratio; hs-CRP high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; NO nitric oxide; TAC total antioxidant capacity; GSH total glutathione; MDA malondialdehyde; UAPI uterine artery pulsatility index

Discussion

In the current study, we investigated the effects of supplementation of Se on clinical symptoms, metabolic status, and uterine artery PI in high-risk pregnant women in terms of PE screening with quad marker. We found that taking Se supplements for 12 weeks by high-risk pregnant women in terms of PE screening with quad marker improved the depression, anxiety, sleep quality scores, UAPI, Se, hs-CRP, TAC, and GSH levels, but did not affect blood pressure, hemoglobin, platelets, AST, ALT, LDH, creatinine, uric acid, protein/creatinine ratio, MDA, and NO levels. Based on these findings, supplementation of Se may be an appropriate adjunct therapy for high-risk pregnant women in terms of PE screening with quad marker. To our knowledge, this evidence is the first study to evaluate the effects of Se on clinical outcomes, metabolic biomarkers, and uterine artery PI in high-risk pregnant women in terms of PE screening with quad marker. Previous evidence has demonstrated that a small increase in Se intake in pregnant women with inadequate Se status could protect them against PE [51]. In the current study, no side effects were seen following supplementation with Se in high-risk pregnant women in terms of PE screening with quad marker throughout the study. It must be considered that mean dietary plus supplemental Se administration in our study patients was lower than upper limits (400 μg). Se is an element with a very narrow quantitative range of levels between deficiency, physiological responses, and toxic dose [16]. Excess of Se in the diet causes chronic food poisoning signs (e.g., nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea). Acute exposure to high amounts of Se leads to a general weakness and neurological disorders [52]. Also, chronic toxicity by an excess of Se leads to selenosis signs, which is manifested by changes and fragility of fingernails, hair loss, infertility, skin rash, gastrointestinal disorders, unpleasant odor in exhaled air, and nervous system disorders [16, 53]. However, data on the toxic effects of Se supplementation on health situation are conflicting. In the study conducted by Burk et al. [54], it indicated that administration of moderate 200 μg/day to large dose 600 μg/day Se was safe in volunteers ages ≥ 18 years for 16 weeks. On the other hand, gastrointestinal signs, hair loss, and memory disorder were reported as the adverse effects of Se intake [55]. However, further evidences are required about potential teratogenicity/toxicity of long-term increased Se intake in high-risk pregnant women in terms of PE screening. Although the beneficial effects of Se (100 μg/day) from the first trimester of their pregnancy until delivery for a period of approximately 6 months were reported [56], we believe that further studies are required to confirm our results.

Effects on Clinical Outcomes and Uterine Artery PI

Previous studies have shown that Se administration has the potential to decrease the risk of PE in pregnant women with low Se levels. Se is known as an essential trace mineral that has many important functions at the concentration of the cell and organism in human and animal health, and so it is relevant to various pathophysiological conditions [57]. We found that supplementation of Se after 12 weeks to high-risk pregnant women in terms of PE screening with quad marker improved the Se levels, and UAPI, but it did not affect the total clinical outcomes, compared with the placebo. Data documenting the effects of supplementation of Se on clinical outcomes and uterine artery PI in high-risk pregnant women in terms of PE screening with quad marker are limited. In a study by Gomez et al. [58], successive changes in uterine artery blood flow patterns between the first and second trimesters of pregnancy and their association with risk of hypertensive disorders and fetal IUGR were investigated. The results showed that compared to normal pregnancies, complication pregnancies have a higher prevalence of bilateral notch and uterine artery PI in each of the first and second trimesters. Pregnant women with sustained abnormal PI are at greater risk for adverse perinatal outcomes. In addition, in a study conducted by Mesdaghinia et al. [50], it was observed that supplementation with Se for 10 weeks led to a higher percentage of women in the Se group had PI of < 1.45 than in the placebo group.

Effects on Metabolic Biomarkers

There are placental changes in PE, linked to an imbalance between the production of ROS and the antioxidant defense system, characterizing the placental oxidative stress that leads to an increase in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [11]. Our study indicated that taking Se supplements for 12 weeks in high-risk pregnant women in terms of PE screening with quad marker resulted in a significant rise in plasma GSH and TAC, and a significant reduction in serum hs-CRP levels compared with the placebo, but unchanged plasma MDA and NO levels. As there is evidence that Se supplementation may have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects [59, 60]. In a study done by Kamali et al. [61], it was seen that the intake of 200 μg/day Se supplements for 4 weeks to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery had beneficial effects on hs-CRP, GSH, and MDA levels, but did not affect other metabolic profiles. Also, total antioxidant status (TAS), and GSH levels had significant increase following supplementation with Se after 45 days in patients with refractory epilepsy, and epilepsy [62]. In addition, results of a meta-analysis in randomized controlled trials indicated a reduction in serum CRP and increased the glutathione peroxidase level in patients with coronary heart disease supplemented with Se [63]. However, in a study conducted by Savory et al. [64], Se supplementation at a dosage of 200 μg daily for 3 weeks among overweight adults did not alter GSH, and TAS levels. Se appeared to provide a protective effect against oxidative stress, and Ca (2 +) entry through modulation of neutrophil transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) calcium channels in patients with PCOS [65]. Also, Se intake may decrease inflammation and oxidative stress through increasing selenoprotein biosynthesis, inhibiting production of ROS/RNS, and the inhibition of nuclear factor kappa light chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-kappa B) by modulating selenoprotein gene expressions [6668].

Effects on Mental Health Parameters

Se deficiency occurred significantly more among the PE pregnant women compared to the normotensive controls [32], and low Se status might experience relatively depressed moods, and support the idea that Se plays a special role in the brain [69]. PE is a pregnancy-associated condition with complex disease mechanisms, and a risk factor for various long-term health outcomes for the infant and mother [70]. PE women most often experience complications of mood disorders in comparison with females with uncomplicated pregnancy [71]. Mental health disorder (depression, anxiety, and sleep) are highly prevalent in high-risk pregnancy such as PE [72, 73]. In our study, a 12-week Se supplementation by high-risk pregnant women in terms of PE screening with quad marker reduced depression, anxiety, and sleep quality scores compared with the placebo. In a study by Mokhber et al. [74], it showed that supplementation with 100 μg/day selenium during pregnancy might be an effective approach for the prevention of postpartum depression level in Iranian women. In addition, Se therapy (200 μg/day) to HIV/drug users led to a significant improvement in decrease anxiety but did not affect depression or distress [75]. Also, current data supports the beneficial effect of Se on central nervous system, depression, and sleep disorders [76]. However, Hawkes and Hornbostel [69] reported that selenium supplementation did not promote improvements in mood in persons eating a typical US diet. While the neuroprotective effect of Se has yet to be definitively characterized, the protective role of Se in psychological disorders could be related to its important action in antioxidant defense [77]. Additionally, Se has been shown to influence health status through its important role in immune function and neurotransmitter turnover rate [78, 79]. Also, Se intake may affect mental health parameters through modulating thyroid function, which in turn play a role in the reduction of depression score [80].

Limitations

The current study had few limitations. Firstly, sample size in our study was small. Future studies with longer duration and higher participant are needed to confirm the validity of our finding. In addition, we did not evaluate dietary intakes of study patients; however, we requested patients not to change their regular dietary intakes and physical activity. Furthermore, additional future studies are needed to examine the effect of Se supplementation on gene expression involved in metabolic profiles, and inflammation factors, as well as on Se-dependent antioxidant enzymes including thioredoxin reductase and GPx isoforms. Unfortunately, because of limited funding, we did not examine the effects of Se supplementation on these measures. In addition, the beneficial effects of Se supplementation on lipid profiles and glucose homeostasis would be of interest, and it is suggested for a future study.

Conclusion

Overall, our study demonstrated that Se supplementation for 12 weeks in high-risk pregnant women in terms of PE screening with quad marker resulted in a significant improvement of depression, anxiety, sleep quality scores, UAPI, Se, GSH, TAC, and hs-CRP levels but did not affect other clinical symptoms and metabolic profiles. This suggests that Se supplementation for 12 weeks at dosage 200 µg/day might confer advantageous therapeutic effects for high-risk pregnant women in terms of PE screening with quad marker. Further evidence is required in other diseases and for longer periods to determine the safety of selenium supplement.

Acknowledgements

This study was the thesis on resident of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Farah Shahin). It has been registered with the IRCT20200608047701N1 registration code in the Iranian Center for Clinical Trials, and was supported by a grant from the Vice-chancellor for Research, KAUMS, Iran (99012). We are thankful of all subjects who participated in this project.

Abbreviations

PE

Preeclampsia

Se

Selenium

GSH

Total glutathione

hs-CRP

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein

MDA

Malondialdehyde

NO

Nitric oxide

TAC

Total antioxidant capacity

UAPI

Uterine artery pulsatility index

Author Contributions

FSH, EM, AG, DSH, MSH, and HB contributed in conception, design, statistical analysis, and drafting of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version for submission. FSH supervised the study.

Funding

The research grant provided by Research Deputy of Kashan University of Medical Sciences (KAUMS/99012).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available because the intellectual property is owned by the funding body. They may be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request containing the approval from the associated funding body.

Declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

At the beginning of the questionnaire distribution session, the purpose of the study was explained for the participants and they were assured about the anonymity and confidentiality of their responses. All participants gave their signed written informed consent letters. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kashan University of Medical Sciences “approval no; IR.KAUMS.MEDNT.REC.1399.008”. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Duley L. The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Semin Perinatol. 2009;33(3):130–137. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Martinez-Portilla R, et al. Incidence of pre-eclampsia and other perinatal complications among pregnant women with congenital heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;58(4):519–528. doi: 10.1002/uog.22174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Aali BS, Ghafoorian J, Mohamad-Alizadeh S (2004) Severe preeclampsia and eclampsia in Kerman, Iran: complications and outcomes. Med Sci Monit 10(4): CR163-CR167 [PubMed]
  • 4.Mayrink J, Costa ML, Cecatti JG. Preeclampsia in 2018: revisiting concepts, physiopathology, and prediction. Sci World J. 2018;6(2018):6268276. doi: 10.1155/2018/6268276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tanaka M, et al. Racial disparity in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in New York State: a 10-year longitudinal population-based study. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(1):163–170. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.068577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Morikawa M, et al. Earlier onset of proteinuria or hypertension is a predictor of progression from gestational hypertension or gestational proteinuria to preeclampsia. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):12708. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92189-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Poon LC, et al. From first-trimester screening to risk stratification of evolving pre-eclampsia in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy: a comprehensive approach. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;55(1):5–12. doi: 10.1002/uog.21869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fox R, et al. Preeclampsia: risk factors, diagnosis, management, and the cardiovascular impact on the offspring. J Clin Med. 2019;8(10):1625. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stitterich N, et al. Risk factors for preeclampsia and eclampsia at a main referral maternity hospital in Freetown, Sierra Leone: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03874-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Williamson RD, et al. Oxidative stress in pre-eclampsia; have we been looking in the wrong place? Pregnancy Hypertens. 2017;8:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2017.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tenório MB, et al. Cross-talk between oxidative stress and inflammation in preeclampsia. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;4(2019):8238727. doi: 10.1155/2019/8238727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yusuf H, et al. Associations of macro and micronutrients and antioxidants intakes with preeclampsia: A case-control study in Jordanian pregnant women. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2019;29(5):458–466. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2019.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Grandi SM, et al. Cardiovascular disease-related morbidity and mortality in women with a history of pregnancy complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2019;139(8):1069–1079. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Caropreso L, et al. Preeclampsia as a risk factor for postpartum depression and psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2020;23(4):493–505. doi: 10.1007/s00737-019-01010-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cetin O, et al. Investigation of maternal psychopathological symptoms, dream anxiety and insomnia in preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(20):2510–2515. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1254185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kieliszek M, Błażejak S. Current knowledge on the importance of selenium in food for living organisms: a review. Molecules. 2016;21(5):609. doi: 10.3390/molecules21050609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kieliszek M, Bano I, Zare H. A comprehensive review on selenium and its effects on human health and distribution in Middle Eastern Countries. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2021;200(3):971–987. doi: 10.1007/s12011-021-02716-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kieliszek M, Błażejak S. Selenium: significance, and outlook for supplementation. Nutrition. 2013;29(5):713–718. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2012.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kieliszek M. Selenium-fascinating microelement, properties and sources in food. Molecules. 2019;24(7):1298. doi: 10.3390/molecules24071298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gladyshev VN, et al. Selenoprotein gene nomenclature. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(46):24036–24040. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.756155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ruseva B, Himcheva I, Nankova D. Importance of selenoproteins for the function of the thyroid gland. Medicine. 2013;3:60–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zabłocka K, Biernat J. The influence of selected nutritional components in lung cancer risk – unsaturated fatty acids, isothiocyanates, selenium. Contemporary Oncology/Współczesna Onkologia. 2010;14(1):54–58. doi: 10.5114/wo.2010.979. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tang C et al (2020) Selenium deficiency-induced redox imbalance leads to metabolic reprogramming and inflammation in the liver. Redox Biol 36:101519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.Kieliszek M, Lipinski B. Pathophysiological significance of protein hydrophobic interactions: An emerging hypothesis. Med Hypotheses. 2018;110:15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2017.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vaz FNC, et al. The relationship between copper, iron, and selenium levels and alzheimer disease. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2018;181(2):185–191. doi: 10.1007/s12011-017-1042-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fakhrolmobasheri M, et al. COVID-19 and selenium deficiency: a systematic review. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2021;5:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s12011-021-02997-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lin CC, et al. Selenium, iron, copper, and zinc levels and copper-to-zinc ratios in serum of patients at different stages of viral hepatic diseases. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2006;109(1):15–24. doi: 10.1385/BTER:109:1:015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sharma P et al (2022) Assessment of Serum elements concentration and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): systematic review and meta-analysis. Biol Trace Elem Res. 10.1007/s12011-021-03058-6 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 29.Navarro-Alarcón M, López-Martínez MC. Essentiality of selenium in the human body: relationship with different diseases. Sci Total Environ. 2000;249(1–3):347–371. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00526-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mistry HD, et al. Selenium in reproductive health. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(1):21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zadrożna M, et al. Antioxidants activities and concentration of selenium, zinc and copper in preterm and IUGR human placentas. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2009;23(2):144–148. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2009.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Eze SC et al (2020) Serum selenium levels of pre-eclamptic and normal pregnant women in Nigeria: A comparative study. PLoS One 27;15(8):e0238263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 33.Pedroso MA, et al. Uterine artery Doppler in screening for preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018;40(5):287–293. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1660777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cnossen JS, et al. Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2008;178(6):701–711. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.070430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rashid M et al (2020) Uterine artery Doppler indices as predictive measures for the pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal 2020(1). 10.54112/bcsrj.v2020i1.23
  • 36.Abdi F, et al. A systematic review of first trimester biochemical and molecular predictive tests for preeclampsia. Curr Hypertens Rev. 2018;14(1):21–28. doi: 10.2174/1573402114666180416160425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Boonpiam R, et al. Quad test for fetal aneuploidy screening as a predictor of small-for-gestational age fetuses: a population-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03298-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yue CY, Zhang CY, Ying CM. Serum markers in quadruple screening associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a case-control study in China. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;511:278–281. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Welz B, Melcher M, Schlemmer G. Determination of selenium in human blood serum. Comparison of two atomic-absorption spectrometric procedures. Z Anal Chem. 1983;316(2):271–276. doi: 10.1007/BF00488201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Benzie IF, Strain JJ. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of "antioxidant power": the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem. 1996;239(1):70–76. doi: 10.1006/abio.1996.0292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tipple TE, Rogers LK (2012) Methods for the determination of plasma or tissue glutathione levels. In: Harris C., Hansen J. (eds) Developmental Toxicology. Methods in Molecular Biology (Methods and Protocols), vol 889. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. 10.1007/978-1-61779-867-2_20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 42.Janero DR. Malondialdehyde and thiobarbituric acid-reactivity as diagnostic indices of lipid peroxidation and peroxidative tissue injury. Free Radic Biol Med. 1990;9(6):515–540. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(90)90131-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tatsch E, et al. A simple and inexpensive automated technique for measurement of serum nitrite/nitrate. Clin Biochem. 2011;44(4):348–350. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2010.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Poon L, et al. Protocol for measurement of mean arterial pressure at 11–13 weeks' gestation. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;31(1):42–48. doi: 10.1159/000335366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Beck AT, Steer RA, Carbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8(1):77–100. doi: 10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Beck AT, et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4(6):561–571. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Buysse DJ, et al. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193–213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rafiei M, Seifi A. An investigation into the reliability and validity of beck anxiety inventory among the university students. JTBCP. 2013;7(27):37–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Vasegh S, Baradaran N. Using the Persian-language version of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II-Persian) for the screening of depression in students. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2014;202(10):738–744. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mesdaghinia E, et al. Clinical and metabolic response to selenium supplementation in pregnant women at risk for intrauterine growth restriction: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2017;178(1):14–21. doi: 10.1007/s12011-016-0911-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rayman MP, et al. Effect of selenium on markers of risk of pre-eclampsia in UK pregnant women: a randomised, controlled pilot trial. Br J Nutr. 2014;112(1):99–111. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514000531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fordyce FM (2013) Selenium Deficiency and Toxicity in the Environment. In: Selinus O. (eds) Essentials of Medical Geology. Springer, Dordrecht. 10.1007/978-94-007-4375-5_16.
  • 53.Nazemi L, et al. Selenium status in soil, water and essential crops of Iran. Iranian J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2012;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/1735-2746-9-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Burk RF, et al. Effects of chemical form of selenium on plasma biomarkers in a high-dose human supplementation trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(4):804–810. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Aldosary BM, et al. Case series of selenium toxicity from a nutritional supplement. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2012;50(1):57–64. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2011.641560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tara F, et al. Selenium supplementation and the incidence of preeclampsia in pregnant Iranian women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;49(2):181–187. doi: 10.1016/S1028-4559(10)60038-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rayman MP. The importance of selenium to human health. Lancet. 2000;356(9225):233–241. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02490-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gómez O, et al. Sequential changes in uterine artery blood flow pattern between the first and second trimesters of gestation in relation to pregnancy outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28(6):802–808. doi: 10.1002/uog.2814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Özkaya MO, et al. Effects of multivitamin/mineral supplementation on trace element levels in serum and follicular fluid of women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) Biol Trace Elem Res. 2011;139(1):1–9. doi: 10.1007/s12011-010-8637-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ozkaya MO, Nazıroğlu M. Multivitamin and mineral supplementation modulates oxidative stress and antioxidant vitamin levels in serum and follicular fluid of women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2465–2466. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.01.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kamali A, Amirani E, Asemi Z. Effects of selenium supplementation on metabolic status in patients undergoing for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2019;191(2):331–337. doi: 10.1007/s12011-019-1636-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Yürekli VA, Nazıroğlu M. Selenium and topiramate attenuates blood oxidative toxicity in patients with epilepsy: a clinical pilot study. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2013;152(2):180–186. doi: 10.1007/s12011-013-9616-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ju W, et al. The effect of selenium supplementation on coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2017;44:8–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2017.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Savory LA (2012) et al., Selenium supplementation and exercise: effect on oxidant stress in overweight adults. Obesity (Silver Spring) 20(4):794–801. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 65.Köse SA, Nazıroğlu M. Selenium reduces oxidative stress and calcium entry through TRPV1 channels in the neutrophils of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2014;158(2):136–142. doi: 10.1007/s12011-014-9929-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ozturk IC, et al. Comparison of plasma malondialdehyde, glutathione, glutathione peroxidase, hydroxyproline and selenium levels in patients with vitiligo and healthy controls. Indian J Dermatol. 2008;53(3):106–110. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.39577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zeng J, Zhou J, Huang K. Effect of selenium on pancreatic proinflammatory cytokines in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. J Nutr Biochem. 2009;20(7):530–536. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2008.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.He YT, et al. Therapeutic effects and molecular mechanisms of anti-fibrosis herbs and selenium on rats with hepatic fibrosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10(5):703–706. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i5.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hawkes WC, Hornbostel L. Effects of dietary selenium on mood in healthy men living in a metabolic research unit. Biol Psychiatry. 1996;39(2):121–128. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(95)00085-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Pittara T, et al. Pre-eclampsia and long-term health outcomes for mother and infant: an umbrella review. BJOG. 2021;128(9):1421–1430. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Brussé I, et al. Impaired maternal cognitive functioning after pregnancies complicated by severe pre-eclampsia: a pilot case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(4):408–412. doi: 10.1080/00016340801915127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Thiagayson P, et al. Depression and anxiety in Singaporean high-risk pregnancies - prevalence and screening. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013;35(2):112–116. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2012.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gruca-Stryjak K, et al. Is there a relationship between pregnancy induced hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea? Case report. Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2014;82(2):156–162. doi: 10.5603/PiAP.2014.0021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mokhber N, et al. Effect of supplementation with selenium on postpartum depression: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(1):104–108. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.482598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Shor-Posner G, et al. Psychological burden in the era of HAART: impact of selenium therapy. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2003;33(1):55–69. doi: 10.2190/PFFD-D920-V041-N5KD. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Albuquerque RG, Tufik S, Andersen ML. Benefits of selenium in the treatment of depression and sleep disorders. Sleep Breath. 2019;23(3):933–934. doi: 10.1007/s11325-019-01816-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Tinggi U. Selenium: its role as antioxidant in human health. Environ Health Prev Med. 2008;13(2):102–108. doi: 10.1007/s12199-007-0019-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Solovyev N, et al. Selenium at the neural barriers: a review. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:630016. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.630016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Naderi M, et al. A comprehensive review on the neuropathophysiology of selenium. Sci Total Environ. 2021;767:144329. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kohrle J, et al. Selenium, the thyroid, and the endocrine system. Endocr Rev. 2005;26(7):944–984. doi: 10.1210/er.2001-0034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available because the intellectual property is owned by the funding body. They may be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request containing the approval from the associated funding body.


Articles from Biological Trace Element Research are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES