. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 29.

Published in final edited form as: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2021 Aug 31;28(8):845–861. doi: 10.1017/S1355617721001004

Table C4.

Correlations between bilingual index scores across different proficiency measures

	Oral Proficiency Interview	Original MINT	MINT Sprint 2^nd Pass	WMPV	WMPC	Average Self-Rating	Spoken Self-Rating^b

Original MINT	.694^**	1
MINT Sprint 2^nd Pass	.691^**	.974^**	1
WMPV	.455^**	.542^**	.582^**	1
WMPC	.287^**	.324^**	.339^**	.351^**	1
Average Self-Rating	.393^**	.332^**	.331^**	.316^**	.186	1
Spoken Self-Rating	.298^**	.209	.209	.242^*	.191	.800^**	1
Translation Recognition Accuracy^a	.323^**	.349^**	.300^**	.098	.124	.181	.195

^**

p < .01,

p < .05. WMPV, Woodcock-Muñoz Picture Vocabulary; WMPC, Woodcock-Muñoz Passage Comprehension.

The translation recognition task only included an overall accuracy score (i.e., no separate scores for each language).

n = 79, one bilingual left the self-rating for spoken proficiency in Spanish blank