TABLE 1.
The GEV results on different microstate detection methods with different topographical clustering strategies.
| (A) GEV values (mean ± standard deviation) | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 valence | Case 5 arousal | |
| MS1 | 0.0780 ± 0.0382 | 0.1209 ± 0.0424 | 0.0758 ± 0.0375 | 0.0721 ± 0.0369 | 0.0712 ± 0.0369 | 0.0763 ± 0.0375 |
| MS2 | 0.0839 ± 0.0318 | 0.0593 ± 0.0309 | 0.0919 ± 0.0348 | 0.0919 ± 0.0346 | 0.0984 ± 0.0362 | 0.0893 ± 0.0342 |
| MS3 | 0.1635 ± 0.0551 | 0.2084 ± 0.0706 | 0.1752 ± 0.0587 | 0.1665 ± 0.0554 | 0.1742 ± 0.0578 | 0.1738 ± 0.0584 |
| MS4 | 0.1780 ± 0.0562 | 0.1176 ± 0.0476 | 0.1617 ± 0.0535 | 0.1726 ± 0.0552 | 0.1608 ± 0.0541 | 0.1652 ± 0.0539 |
| Total | 0.6711 ± 0.0497 | 0.6738 ± 0.0523 | 0.6733 ± 0.0512 | 0.6725 ± 0.0508 | 0.6732 ± 0.0511 | 0.6732 ± 0.0511 |
|
| ||||||
| (B) GEV proportions. | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Proportion (100%) | MS1 | MS2 | MS3 | MS4 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Task-Free | Case 1 | 18.91% | 18.93% | 30.62% | 31.55% | |
| Case 2 | 23.47% | 16.15% | 33.86% | 26.52% | ||
| Case 3 | 18.05% | 20.16% | 30.79% | 31.00% | ||
| Case 4 | 17.67% | 19.67% | 30.59% | 32.07% | ||
| Task-Guided | Case 5 (valence) | 17.51% | 20.80% | 30.91% | 30.78% | |
| Case 5 (arousal) | 18.11% | 19.76% | 30.76% | 31.37% | ||
| Cronbach’s α | 0.9784 | 0.9782 | 0.9840 | 0.9862 | ||