TABLE 4.
The computational efficiency results of different microstate detection methods with different topographical clustering strategies.
| First-step clustering | Second-step clustering | Total | ||
| Task-free | Case 1 | 224,896 s | 32 s | 224,928 s |
| Case 2 | 191,200 s | 33 s | 191,233 s | |
| Case 3 | 604,160 s | 3,412 s | 607,572 s | |
| Case 4 | 211,560 s | 32 s | 211,592 s | |
| Task-Guided | Case 5 (valence) | 604,160 s | 682 s (low valence) | 605,476 s |
| 634 s (high valence) | ||||
| Case 5 (arousal) | 604,160 s | 679 s (low arousal) | 605,531 s | |
| 692 s (high arousal) |
c, the number of clusters; I, the number of iteration. Here, c ranges from 2 to 8, and I is set to 1000.