Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 23;37:38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.12.009

Table 4.

Performance of Proclarix, PSAD, and the ERSPC MRI model for csPCa detection using the most sensitive threshold in biopsy-naïve men and men undergoing repeat biopsy

Parameter csPCs detection, n/N (%)
Proclarix (cutoff = 10%)
PSAD (cutoff = 0.07 ng/ml/cm3)
ERSPC MRI RC (cutoff = 1.5%)
Initial Bx Repeat Bx Initial Bx Repeat Bx Initial Bx Repeat Bx
Sensitivity 18/18 (100) 7/7 (100) 15/18 (83.3) 6/7 (85.7 17/18 (94.4) 7/7 (100)
Specificity 30/103 (29.1) 6/41 (14.6) 33/103(32.0) 8/41 (19.5) 6/103 (5.8) 5/41 (12.2)
Negative predictive value 30/30 (100) 6/6 (100 33/36 (91.7) 8/9 (88.9) 6/7 (85.7) 5/5 (100)
Positive predictive value 18/91 (19.8) 7/42 (16.7) 15/85 (17.6) 6/39 (15.4) 17/114 (14.9) 7/43 (16.3)
Accuracy 48/121 (39.7) 13/48 (27.1) 48/121(39.7) 14/48 (29.2 23/121 (19.0) 13/48 (27.1)
Prostate biopsies avoided 30/121 (24.8) 6/48 (12.5) 36/121 (29.8) 9/48 (18.8) 7/121 (5.8) 5/48 (10.4
Decrease in iPCa overdetection 7/121 (5.8) 2/48 (4.2) 7/121 (5.8) 2/48 (4.2) 1/121 (0.8) 1/48 (2.1)
Misdiagnosis of csPCa 0/18 (0) 0/7 (0) 3/18 (16.7) 1/7 (14.3) 1/8 (5.6) 0/7 (0)

PSAD = prostate-specific antigen density; PCa = prostate cancer; csPCa = clinically significant PCa; iPCa = insignificant PCa; Bx = biopsy; ESPRC = European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; RC = risk calculator.