Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD005321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005321.pub2

4. Clinical benefit table: Artz versus placebo. Dichotomous outcome measures.

Study Time Treatment Outcome No. improved No. of pts Risk (%) Risk difference NNT
Lohmander 1996 1‐4 wk E: Artzal Number of patients improved 59 96 61 1 100
    C: Saline   56 93 60    
Shichikawa 1983a 1‐4 wk E: Artz Number of patients improved 87 103 84 20 5
    C: Vehicle   67 105 64    
Shichikawa 1983b 1‐4 wk E: Artz Number of patients improved 38 48 79 9 11
    C: Vehicle   35 50 70    
Lohmander 1996 5‐13 wk E: Artzal Number of patients improved 53 96 55 0 0
    C: Saline   51 93 55    
Puhl 1993 5‐13 wk E: Artz Number of patients improved 86 95 91 10 10
    C: Vehicle   81 100 81    
Lohmander 1996 14‐26 wk E: Artzal Number of patients improved 58 96 60 14 7.1
    C: Saline   43 93 46    
Karlsson 2002a 14‐26 wk E: Artzal Number of clinical failures 2 90 2 ‐9 11
    C: Saline   7 66 11    
Karlsson 2002a 45‐52 wk E: Artzal Number of clinical failures 26 66 39 ‐15 6.7
    C: Saline   26 48 54    
Karlsson 2002a 14‐26 wk E: Artzal Number of survivors 39 90 43 10 10
    C: Saline   22 66 33