Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD005321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005321.pub2

Comparison 16. (Hyalgan plus exercise plus ultrasound) versus (exercise plus ultrasound).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Pain (0‐10 cm VAS) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 End of treatment 1 66 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.5 [‐1.32, 0.32]
1.2 One‐year follow‐up 1 61 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.60 [‐1.31, 0.11]
2 Lequesne Index (0‐26) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 End of treatment 1 66 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.40 [‐0.85, 0.05]
2.2 One‐year follow‐up 1 61 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.80 [‐1.58, ‐0.02]
3 Range of motion (degrees) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 End of treatment 1 66 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 6.0 [‐0.79, 12.79]
3.2 One‐year follow‐up 1 61 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 6.00 [‐2.05, 14.05]
4 Ambulation speed (metres per minute) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 End of treatment 1 66 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 5.40 [3.99, 6.81]
4.2 One‐year follow‐up 1 61 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 5.0 [1.58, 8.42]
5 Safety: total withdrawals overall 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
5.1 During treatment 1 70 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.04, 3.05]
5.2 Overall 1 70 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.5 [0.14, 1.84]