Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD005321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005321.pub2

Comparison 53. HA versus HA.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Pain in movement (number of patients improved) 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 1 to 4 weeks post‐injection 2 295 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.89 [0.76, 1.03]
2 Pressure pain (number of patients improved) 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 1 to 4 weeks post‐injection 2 319 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.94 [0.80, 1.10]
3 Lequesne Index (0‐24) 2   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 1 to 4 weeks post‐injection 1 233 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.46 [‐0.59, 1.51]
3.2 5 to 13 weeks post‐injection 2 261 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.29 [‐0.64, 1.23]
4 Patient global assessment 5   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 1 to 4 weeks post‐injection 3 358 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.84, 1.14]
4.2 5 to 13 weeks post‐injection 2 301 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.91 [0.78, 1.05]
4.3 14 to 26 weeks post‐injection 1 49 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.11 [0.67, 6.70]
4.4 45 to 52 weeks post‐injection 1 159 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.85 [0.70, 1.03]