Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD005321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005321.pub2

Carrabba 1995.

Methods Randomised
 Controlled 
 Trial
 Double‐blind
 Blind observer
 Parallel‐group
 Placebo‐ and arthrocentesis‐ controlled
 Single centre
 ITT analysis
 (5 inj HA versus PL)
Participants Country:
 Italy
 Mean age: 60
 % Female:63
 Mean disease
 duration: NR
 Duration:60 days
 Phase 1, 6 mth Phase 2
 Number randomised:100
 (20/group)
 Inclusion:
 >= 40 y
 ACR diagnosis of knee OA
 clinical history of
 painful knee OA for > 6 mth
 + knee effusion (> 3 ml)
 pain on movement (> 40/100 mm VAS)
 Exclusion:
 generalised OA
 secondary knee OA
 known or suspected joint infection
 poor general health status or specific condition that would interfere with functional assessments
 arthrocentesis and/or IA injection within 3 mth
 very severe knee OA (planned intra‐medicinal product)
 Baseline values:
 pain on movement
 PL: 64.4, AR:64.5
 HA1:61.7,HA3:
 64.1,HA5: 63.3
 Lequesne
 PL:14.5,AR:14.3
 HA1:14.0,HA3:
 14.9, HA5:15.0
 pain at rest
 PL:45.6,AR:43.3
 HA1:40.5, HA3:
 44.7, HA5:43.6
Interventions Hyalgan 20mg/2 ml 1 injection and arthrocentesis + 4 weekly arthrocentesis,
 Hyalgan 20mg/2 ml and arthro‐
 centesis + 2 HA weekly injections+
 2 arthrocentesis,
 Hyalgan 20mg/2
 ml and arthro‐
 centesis + 4 HA weekly injections,
 Arthrocentesis=5 weekly arthrocentesis,
 Placebo= Arthro‐
 centesis and 2 ml
 saline + 4 weekly saline injections
 Concurrent therapy:
 paracetamol permitted
Outcomes pain at rest by pt on 100 mm VAS
 pain on movement by pt
 on 100 mm VAS
 Lequesne Index
 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
 Range of motion by goniometer (flexion)
 daily paracet‐
 amol consumption
 presence
 joint effusion (volume)
 global pt and observer assessment of treatment efficacy
Notes Jadad's:3/5
 R‐1,B‐1,W‐1
 Effusions
 aspirated at Visit 1, but no aspira‐
 tion at other visits except Day 35 (one wk after last injection) and 2 mth after beginning of study.
 Dr. G.B. Guillou and Dr. E. Maheu assisted in preparing paper. J.M. Grouin (Fidia France) provided statistical analysis.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear